DWARF / GREENSKIN new fortress without postern [FEEDBACK]

[Tesq]

order is even exploiting / taking advantage of this hard all they do is zerg chaos/emp and atk fortress; numerical advanatge plus that stupid large door is a joke really... at least 60% fortress they do are of chaos over 3 whole pairing.

if the point was to make fortress harder then this has only happened for destru sy....

ork/dwarf door are a joke aswell, they are too tiny defenders have too much advantage; fortress door need to be 3 char wide, 5 like chaos is a joke and 2 like dwar/greenskin is a joke aswell.
You can edit texture , you've done it with postern ........

please , if you can, take care of this too.... becasue is crystal clear its unfair.

Butchers Pass vs Stonewatch (pretty same in terms of "funnel lenght", but compare the door width)


Fell landing vs Shine (actually this is ONLY similar entrance between order and destro)


Maw vs Reik (no comments, just a joke)

[Babanim]

Can we get rid of collision entirely during forts?

[normanis]

i think we need also 2 stairs to 3dfloor. so there is nomore destroblob. there is also short passege. where choppas pull trough wall ( pulls anyway is so bugged in funnel situations) .
now we now why there is always elf zone opened for forts. and why destro give up on dwarf zones and emp. its not because of order opiness byt because evryone know point of taking 2 zones if u will wipe at fort. so basically destro premades give up zones, to let enter order pugs and wipe tham at fort. dont whant to mention 1 orc keep is with cheating relief, where attackers is like on bottle neck from defenders. if gm change something in forts why dont start change all keeps so there is fair for both sides. and oofc start balance game.

[Natherul]

Can we get rid of collision entirely during forts?

not heppening, its a standard feature of the game and is not getting removed in forts specifically.