Search found 1910 matches

>
by Dabbart
Tue Sep 03, 2019 9:17 pm
Forum: Discussions
Topic: Tank Morale Overhaul Thread v2
Replies: 140
Views: 17838

Re: Tank Morale Overhaul Thread v2

Then the arguement that we'll nerf sm pounce range (but not remove it) and give front line tanks (not squishy mdps) a 45ft pull instead to make up for it so not only do they get to keep solar on their god tank sm gets to keep its small scale gap closer they also get the nail in the morale coffin a ...
by Dabbart
Tue Sep 03, 2019 7:26 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: A message for the devs
Replies: 121
Views: 14344

Re: A message for the devs

I think people are forgetting the main issue here, is the Account Seller. Not the sharing of accounts. It is common knowledge for those that have been here awhile, and those that frequent the forums(Peter counts as both), that sharing your acct can be dangerous, as you are liable for anything tied t...
by Dabbart
Tue Sep 03, 2019 7:03 pm
Forum: Discussions
Topic: Tank Morale Overhaul Thread v2
Replies: 140
Views: 17838

Re: Tank Morale Overhaul Thread v2

M3 - Clear the Skies - NEW Previous - Grants a Hold the Line buff to your group for 12s - rejected Proposed - Grants a 3000pt Absorb for Magic/Ranged damage for group members within 100' for 12s - Shield Required The thought behind a shield-only morale was to provide defenses to your group. Using H...
by Dabbart
Tue Sep 03, 2019 12:21 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: A message for the devs
Replies: 121
Views: 14344

Re: A message for the devs

Lurehtan wrote:
Tue Sep 03, 2019 12:15 pm
Dev willingness to ban people for disagreement is one of the lamest and saddest things about this server
Lurehtan - Joined:Fri Aug 30, 2019 7:16 am

Hao, is that you?
by Dabbart
Tue Sep 03, 2019 7:29 am
Forum: Off Topic
Topic: Memes - unlock?
Replies: 4
Views: 4083

Re: Memes - unlock?

Spoiler:
Image
by Dabbart
Tue Aug 27, 2019 1:20 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Scenarios fate
Replies: 40
Views: 4006

Re: Scenarios fate

Input a Skill Usage Check. If you haven't used Guard in the last 2 SCs, then you lose your Tank Privileges for a week.

/sarcasm. But not really.
by Dabbart
Mon Aug 26, 2019 9:53 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: How scenario works - Feedback
Replies: 70
Views: 7343

Re: How scenario works - Feedback

Howdy guys, back again, been awhile. Note: I've been gone for a while, and only returned at the last x2 event. So my perspective is from playing since then only. A few thoughts: 1, Domination shouldn't count until 2min into the SC, and shouldn't kick-in until the 5th minute. This still alleviates th...
by Dabbart
Mon Aug 06, 2018 10:56 pm
Forum: Changelogs
Topic: Server hotfix notes 06/08/2018
Replies: 129
Views: 13374

Re: Server hotfix notes 06/08/2018

I read this entire thread. It has been asked here multiple times, and asked by others in other threads multiple times. And at this point, not sufficiently addressed(imo). From the perspective of the DPS what is an “acceptable” rate of disrupt? Even a 10% chance will give you strings of disrupts on o...
by Dabbart
Sun Aug 05, 2018 10:55 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Didn't any absorbing skills stack with armor, resist or any decreasing dmg buff, equipment (mitigation)?
Replies: 20
Views: 2284

Re: Didn't any absorbing skills stack with armor, resist or any decreasing dmg buff, equipment (mitigation)?

Ramasee wrote:
Sun Aug 05, 2018 10:03 pm
Base Damage + Stat Modifier * (Offensive Stat - Target's Toughness) = predamage.

Predamage - absorb = postdamage

Post damage is then modified by %modifiers such as critical hit damage, armor, resistance, guard, etc.
Aha! Thanks mate. I couldn’t get my brain around that.
by Dabbart
Sun Aug 05, 2018 9:11 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Didn't any absorbing skills stack with armor, resist or any decreasing dmg buff, equipment (mitigation)?
Replies: 20
Views: 2284

Re: Didn't any absorbing skills stack with armor, resist or any decreasing dmg buff, equipment (mitigation)?

So, the absorp takes its damage regardless of damage decreases, then you mitigate at the number you “should” of if there was no bubble, and the rest of the damage is detaunted? It’s not the absorp amount that seems weird, but the mitigation. It just seems weird that you “lose” 50% or your mitigatio...