Client control coming on 16th of May (which is also coincidentally my birthday), get hype.
Search found 442 matches
- Wed May 02, 2018 8:28 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Client Control
- Replies: 20
- Views: 5786
- Wed May 02, 2018 8:14 pm
- Forum: High Elves
- Topic: SM [Protection of Hoet]
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1870
Re: SM [Protection of Hoet]
Unless there was a patch last night to change this, I'm 99% sure that it does give a party bubble. 50 ft is just a smaller area than you'd think. I practically have to stand right next to someone to make sure they get the bubble.
- Wed May 02, 2018 8:25 am
- Forum: Order
- Topic: LF Guild for SM
- Replies: 0
- Views: 781
LF Guild for SM
Looking for a guild for my 40/41 SM. Primarily 6 man/Scenario spamming. Offensive & defensive both available, though offensive is better geared because medallions are hard. I have a very erratic schedule and am randomly on and off anywhere between 12 PM - 12 AM EST (which I think is 6 PM - 6 AM ...
- Mon Apr 30, 2018 8:38 pm
- Forum: Rejected
- Topic: [Swordmaster] Forceful Shock
- Replies: 71
- Views: 38058
Re: [Swordmaster] Forceful Shock [Close Date: 12th May]
SM in my mind absolutely deserves a single target punt. Every single other tank in the game has some way to reposition a key opponent with a ST punt; SM's attempts typically lead to a bunch of opponents being thrown around, opponents who are now immune to a plethora of other CC. Given that ST punts ...
- Mon Apr 30, 2018 5:19 am
- Forum: Rejected
- Topic: [Swordmaster] Forceful Shock
- Replies: 71
- Views: 38058
Re: [Swordmaster] Forceful Shock [Close Date: 12th May]
I have no idea if it's possible to code the tactic to add a shield required tag to an ability, but I have a suspicion that it is not. If any devs are around, feel free to clarify whether this is possible or not. Additionally, there is no EFFECTIVE offensive build that I've ever heard or seen of that...
- Sun Apr 29, 2018 6:58 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Lets Bitch more and Complain
- Replies: 14
- Views: 4054
Re: Lets Bitch more and Complain
Complaining is the catalyst to improvement.
- Sat Apr 28, 2018 11:49 pm
- Forum: Rejected
- Topic: [Swordmaster] Forceful Shock
- Replies: 71
- Views: 38058
Re: [Swordmaster] Forceful Shock [Close Date: 12th May]
Gotcha. Good points. Given the ability is core, would you have the tactic moved into the Vaul tree somewhere, or do you feel the SNB prerequisite would be sufficient? (Playing Devil's advocate here). Both Forceful Shock talent and Graceful Strike are core, however I feel that the requirement of a S...
- Sat Apr 28, 2018 10:54 pm
- Forum: Rejected
- Topic: [Swordmaster] Forceful Shock
- Replies: 71
- Views: 38058
Re: [Swordmaster] Forceful Shock [Close Date: 12th May]
By 'it should require a SNB', I mean that whatever ability we decide to use, it should be made to have a SNB prerequisite (if it doesn't already) - so that only SNB SM can use it. However, this would mean giving it a CD of 20 seconds so as to be standardised with other SNB tank punts: what ability ...
- Sat Apr 28, 2018 10:22 pm
- Forum: Rejected
- Topic: [Swordmaster] Forceful Shock
- Replies: 71
- Views: 38058
Re: [Swordmaster] Forceful Shock [Repost]
I feel that giving FS to a Vaul ability would be best. It should require a SNB, lest 2h Khaine SM provide huge damage, BS, AOE KB and a ST KB (i.e. BG situation all over again). I feel that a CD would need to be given, and for this reason it can’t really be given to GS (a spammable that requires no...
- Sat Apr 28, 2018 8:58 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: WH vs. WE
- Replies: 28
- Views: 10112
Re: WH vs. WE
I've honestly always seem them at about equal, but the overall atmosphere of Order (lack of true healers, MANY dps tanks who don't guard) makes WE significantly better in practice.