Return of Reckoning

I think look have less to do with it, its more that in general Order cares a lot more about ORVR than destro and rolls ranged for RVR. Order relentlessly push rvr/cities over and over everyday, regardless of losing 70-80% of cities. In comparison destro is scared to push end zones because "it w...

Its about the type of person imo. Playing the bad/evil side in mmo is the mainstream thing in every one. So if you have that mentality and a little less individuality you are going to gravitate to playing the right classes the right way. Thats why order is more varied. There is no bad/evil side in ...

My suggestion: Lock forts to 180 vs 150. Add 2 invaders for the attackers that successfully pushed the end zone before fort. (with the same requirement as defenders taking back the end zone) It would encourage people to push multiple zones. People who dont't get in fort get 2 invaders, and can go pu...

[Stryke] is a competitive guild started as a small groups of players that first met from pug cities. We established a strong and consistent core from it, and eventfully started our own guild. We try to make it to every city siege, and run premade SC/small scale RVR in between. We also run all 6 man ...

Frustrating or not, it doesnt make it ok for anyone to behave badly." Wrong gear" mentality can go pack itself in a box and fudge off. Just let people enjoy the game without others having to be know it all:s. And if they know that much about how its played, maybe they should play better t...

Let me expose clearly the equation : case A : (asymetric rewarding) > Give a better reward to the winning side (actually what happens in last zone). This should be logical to reward winners and not losers. What do we see ? : A majority of players are moving to the winning side. case B : (asymetric ...

Well, looks like the current strat is to deny order invaders by all porting out. No defenders no rewards.

Seems like a fitting solution. Abuse game mechanic for free invaders? Abuse game mechanic right back to deny invaders.

I think hiding behind "this is what community wanted" is not the right approach. We tried, it didn't work as intended, lets admit the mistake and go back to what have worked. I beg your pardon? I'm hiding behind nothing. But there is a moment where you will have to consider "your&quo...

Can GM can clarify that xrealming (or whatever you want to call it) for the SOLE purpose of throwing/fixing zones just to get invaders is intentional or a bannable offense like organizing throws in forts or ram trolling. Who exactly would do the reporting. Right now you've got more finger-pointing ...

Can GM can clarify that xrealming (or whatever you want to call it) for the SOLE purpose of throwing/fixing zones just to get invaders is intentional or a bannable offense like organizing throws in forts or ram trolling.