Recent Topics

Ads

[DEVELOPER PREVIEW] CONQUEROR

Talk about the development of the emulator and related services.
Check out new and upcoming features to be implemented onto the server.
Forum rules
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
User avatar
Toldavf
Posts: 1586

Re: [DEVELOPER PREVIEW] CONQUEROR

Post#31 » Sun Feb 19, 2017 5:05 pm

Truly doom flayer had some ugly sets :-P
Khorlar, Thorvold, Sjohgar, Anareth, Toldavf, Hartwin, Gotrin and others -_-

Image

Ads
User avatar
Toldavf
Posts: 1586

Re: [DEVELOPER PREVIEW] CONQUEROR

Post#32 » Sun Feb 19, 2017 5:38 pm

Torquemadra wrote:
Toldavf wrote:Truly doom flayer had some ugly sets :-P
Yep and the textures arent even very good, how Mythic were able to slot a t4 set above sov and got away with it is beyond me, I guess people really needed something new.
I'm guesing people where to busying gawking/complaining about the stats and set bonuses to really spare a thought for their ugliness.
Khorlar, Thorvold, Sjohgar, Anareth, Toldavf, Hartwin, Gotrin and others -_-

Image

User avatar
Arconnn
Posts: 130

Re: [DEVELOPER PREVIEW] CONQUEROR

Post#33 » Sun Feb 19, 2017 5:48 pm

Think you could show WP female sets? Like Annihilator, If I remember correctly, they're very different to the male version.
Eliane Radigue's disciple
Trilogie De La Mort

User avatar
Theseus
Posts: 526

Re: [DEVELOPER PREVIEW] CONQUEROR

Post#34 » Sun Feb 19, 2017 5:57 pm

RyanMakara wrote:
Theseus wrote:
RyanMakara wrote: Doomflayer look went with a very minimalist Witch Hunter appearance. Some love it, others despise it. I always thought it looked sort of cool, as it's different from the long-ass trench coats you see late-game.

Same as per live; 45.
I am clearly at the despising side, what could be couler as trenchcoat?^^

But as I can get the Dominator, I ma cool with it.^^
What's edgier than a trench coat on a trench coat-heavy class? A complete lack of trench coat.
Ok, its hard to agrue with that logic, I ll give you that. But it still looks kind of weird.^^

But as I said, it might be good as an alternate apearance for all who dont like trenchcoats.^^

I dont think that we will see lots of them around though.^^
Andyrion Ulthenair
Arphyrion Soulblade

User avatar
Theseus
Posts: 526

Re: [DEVELOPER PREVIEW] CONQUEROR

Post#35 » Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:04 pm

Torquemadra wrote:
Theseus wrote:
RyanMakara wrote: What's edgier than a trench coat on a trench coat-heavy class? A complete lack of trench coat.
Ok, its hard to agrue with that logic, I ll give you that. But it still looks kind of weird.^^

But as I said, it might be good as an alternate apearance for all who dont like trenchcoats.^^

I dont think that we will see lots of them around though.^^
Its broken, its missing the buttflap part of the coat, the female version has it, will fix later on with client control.
Ah ok.... thanks for the info. That seems a pretty strange bug we got there.... but its quite funny as well.^^
Andyrion Ulthenair
Arphyrion Soulblade

User avatar
Tesq
Posts: 5704

Re: [DEVELOPER PREVIEW] CONQUEROR

Post#36 » Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:19 pm

Would be quite somethig get our hand in t7 set appereance, i hope is there somewhere in the client

It must be
Image

kryss
Posts: 456

Re: [DEVELOPER PREVIEW] CONQUEROR

Post#37 » Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:25 pm

Torquemadra wrote:
Theseus wrote:
RyanMakara wrote: What's edgier than a trench coat on a trench coat-heavy class? A complete lack of trench coat.
Ok, its hard to agrue with that logic, I ll give you that. But it still looks kind of weird.^^

But as I said, it might be good as an alternate apearance for all who dont like trenchcoats.^^

I dont think that we will see lots of them around though.^^


Its broken, its missing the buttflap part of the coat, the female version has it, will fix later on with client control.

So this will be the final appearance?

https://www.google.it/search?q=doomflay ... 7MaCr2FHZM:

User avatar
Stmichael1989
Posts: 184

Re: [DEVELOPER PREVIEW] CONQUEROR

Post#38 » Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:31 pm

This reminds me of how much I appreciate the armor appearance tab. Not that I'm blaming the devs, Mythic just had about 2 full sets for each class (on order at least) that I liked, and outside of that I have no idea what the **** they were doing.

Seriously, that WH hat looks like a dunce cap. Who looks at that and thinks "This is the garb of one of the most feared agents in the Empire."?
StMichael - 40 Warrior Priest
Elhim - 40 Shadow Warrior
Cullexus - 40 Witch Hunter
Teuton Codpiece - 40 Knight
Gritkicker - 40 Slayer

Ads
Sulorie
Posts: 7222

Re: [DEVELOPER PREVIEW] CONQUEROR

Post#39 » Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:35 pm

Telperien wrote:Conq..........Invader.....Warlord
Bloodlord....Sentinel....Dark Promise

Expansions: Tyrant and [Warpforged]

Like that?
Sentinel was equal to conqueror, dark promise was equal to invader. Bloodlord was on a level similar to annihilator.
Dying is no option.

User avatar
Grolar
Posts: 511

Re: [DEVELOPER PREVIEW] CONQUEROR

Post#40 » Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:43 pm

Looking good.

Love this Black Orc armor on the left!!!...just sayin :D

Image
THUMP - "MEDIOCRE!!" ...Who's laughing now?

Image

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests