Any chance you would reconsider the current single-front system and possibly open up the other contested zones? If nothing else, then maybe at least during primetime?
I know the current system is there to force the opposite forces to clash, but battling in the same narrow zone for 8-12 hours or sometimes days gets both boring and tedious quite fast.
It also gets very zergy during primetime, which really isn't that much of a hoot either. And with only one zone to fight in, most tactical issues narrows down to having the biggest zerg and the stortest distance to run from your warcamp spawn to the keep you're defending.
The old version, with three active fronts, actually made the game somewhat tactical by giving the underdog an opportunity to do a counter-strike in another zone (or fake one) - which again helped splitting up a zerg.
It would also give more push and pull between the pairings and a more fluid feel to the game in general.
The counter-argument is of course that some players will avoid fights and go for empty keeps - even for greatly dimished rewards. Compared to the current primetime zerg-fest I personally see that as the lesser of two evils. And a lot of small scale premades loves to hunt AAO - and would undoubtedly give most keep-ninjas a run for their money.
Suggestion: Revert to multiple active zones
Forum rules
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
Structured class balance suggestions belong in the Balance Proposal subforum. Class-related discussion in this section are considered as ongoing debates and ARE NOT reviewed for balance changes.
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
Structured class balance suggestions belong in the Balance Proposal subforum. Class-related discussion in this section are considered as ongoing debates and ARE NOT reviewed for balance changes.
- Specialpatrol
- Posts: 294
Suggestion: Revert to multiple active zones
APONYMOUS l WP l R40 l RR8X
BRAKEDOWN l KOTBS l R40 l RR8X
BOILING l BW l R40 l RR8X
PUFFED l SLY l R40 l RR8X
RHYTHM l AM l R40 l RR8X
EEWULL l DOK l R3X l RR4X
BRAKEDOWN l KOTBS l R40 l RR8X
BOILING l BW l R40 l RR8X
PUFFED l SLY l R40 l RR8X
RHYTHM l AM l R40 l RR8X
EEWULL l DOK l R3X l RR4X
Ads
Re: Suggestion: Revert to multiple active zones
Nah, more stuff needs to be fixed first, the systemry of notifying what's what and where it's at, all that stuff.
. -= Cult Of Chaos =- GUILD -= Cult Leader =- . -= Kagaz Wrathson - The Decioblidevannihilator - Black Orc =- .
. -= Dresden RoR Info - 4 pins and counting! =- . #WAAAGH ^_^ #AllSilenceIsGolden @_Q
. -= Dresden RoR Info - 4 pins and counting! =- . #WAAAGH ^_^ #AllSilenceIsGolden @_Q
Re: Suggestion: Revert to multiple active zones
This would invariably hurt NA more than EU, and it would encourage pugs to hunt for the quickest or closest zone lock.
<Salt Factory>
- wargrimnir
- Head Game Master
- Posts: 8287
- Contact:
Re: Suggestion: Revert to multiple active zones
Yes, yes. We've heard this suggestion before. Thanks for your time, I'm not sure we need another 40 pages of discussion.
If you hunt through the forums you may find devs saying "No." and perhaps giving reasons why it's important to consolidate RvR into one area. They're still applicable today, and will be for a long time, our feelings haven't changed a bit.
If you hunt through the forums you may find devs saying "No." and perhaps giving reasons why it's important to consolidate RvR into one area. They're still applicable today, and will be for a long time, our feelings haven't changed a bit.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 114 guests