Dummies for testing
Forum rules
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
Structured class balance suggestions belong in the Balance Proposal subforum. Class-related discussion in this section are considered as ongoing debates and ARE NOT reviewed for balance changes.
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
Structured class balance suggestions belong in the Balance Proposal subforum. Class-related discussion in this section are considered as ongoing debates and ARE NOT reviewed for balance changes.
Ads
Re: Dummies for testing
Wouldnt it be possible to make it so, that the test mobs give no xp?Hargrim wrote:The 'test mobs' were removed because you could grind from 1 to 40 in your capital which amounted to no effort approach, which in turn is not supported here.
Andyrion Ulthenair
Arphyrion Soulblade
Arphyrion Soulblade
Re: Dummies for testing
Or make them completely unkillable/give them 1kkkk of HP so nobody would even bother grinding anything on them
Spoiler:
Re: Dummies for testing
And what's the difference between this and training dummies?Theseus wrote:Wouldnt it be possible to make it so, that the test mobs give no xp?Hargrim wrote:The 'test mobs' were removed because you could grind from 1 to 40 in your capital which amounted to no effort approach, which in turn is not supported here.
Re: Dummies for testing
Just no xp, no loot, unkillable object with diff armor values and stats.
- Fallenkezef
- Posts: 1483
Re: Dummies for testing
I think the staff are looking to avoid the list of "x class is better than y class, buff my class" posts that will come from such.
Alea iacta est
Re: Dummies for testing
It is just someone for some peculiar reason is against players getting better through empirical understanding of their builds. I guess the problem is that with a reference dummy you can get all the math out, even a small "ninja" tweak of a class can be objectively detected.
And it seems it is not Hargrim who is against it...
And it seems it is not Hargrim who is against it...
Last edited by sunnyray on Wed Mar 14, 2018 10:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Dummies for testing
Probably going to get those anyway, people don't need a practice dummy to provide such threads.Fallenkezef wrote:I think the staff are looking to avoid the list of "x class is better than y class, buff my class" posts that will come from such.
Khorlar, Thorvold, Sjohgar, Anareth, Toldavf, Hartwin, Gotrin and others -_-
Ads
- Fallenkezef
- Posts: 1483
Re: Dummies for testing
Sadly true, thats why I picked my class for looks and not stats. They could nef Chosen into the ground and it'll still look badassToldavf wrote:Probably going to get those anyway, people don't need a practice dummy to provide such threads.Fallenkezef wrote:I think the staff are looking to avoid the list of "x class is better than y class, buff my class" posts that will come from such.
Alea iacta est
Re: Dummies for testing
It sounded, like the proposal was vetoed, because it could be exploited because of xp. Therefore my question. It seems I missunderstood.Hargrim wrote:And what's the difference between this and training dummies?Theseus wrote:Wouldnt it be possible to make it so, that the test mobs give no xp?Hargrim wrote:The 'test mobs' were removed because you could grind from 1 to 40 in your capital which amounted to no effort approach, which in turn is not supported here.
Andyrion Ulthenair
Arphyrion Soulblade
Arphyrion Soulblade
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Zxul and 40 guests