Get coordinated. Join a guild. Make yourself valuable, or enjoy the long slow painful road of pugging for scraps. This isn't T1 anymore.
[/quote]
It sounds more like you want a place for solo queuers to join together as oppose to facing premades, and also change the system of the city for smaller scale fights. Which would require a lot of changes internally including boss HP / cannon HP etc.
I really don't see the positives here unfortunately.
[/quote]
No the main post question still stands does city need to be 24v24?
Is ranked in the future going to to be 24v24 is every fight in the game that means something going to be a 24v24 where is the variation in gameplay.
Im not a fan of how it is and im sure other people feel the same.
scraps and t1? pls keep the post on topic cheers
Does city have to be 24v24?
Forum rules
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
Structured class balance suggestions belong in the Balance Proposal subforum. Class-related discussion in this section are considered as ongoing debates and ARE NOT reviewed for balance changes.
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
Structured class balance suggestions belong in the Balance Proposal subforum. Class-related discussion in this section are considered as ongoing debates and ARE NOT reviewed for balance changes.
Ads
Re: Does city have to be 24v24?
Cities are 24v24 content, that's how they was designed and that's how they're implemented.
You're providing a suggestion and I'm providing counter arguments.
It's like asking 'Does 40 have to be max level' or 'Does a scenario have to be 6'. Cities are intended for 24v24 and there's no update or foreseeable plan released to have that changed. That's not to say they can't or won't change, but you need to be able to answer arguments provided rather than just shutting them down.
- MAXROYPHILLIP
- Posts: 11
Re: Does city have to be 24v24?
you think cities have to be 24v24 and solo quers should face premades. ok tyKaelang wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 12:59 amCities are 24v24 content, that's how they was designed and that's how they're implemented.
You're providing a suggestion and I'm providing counter arguments.
It's like asking 'Does 40 have to be max level' or 'Does a scenario have to be 6'. Cities are intended for 24v24 and there's no update or foreseeable plan released to have that changed. That's not to say they can't or won't change, but you need to be able to answer arguments provided rather than just shutting them down.
Re: Does city have to be 24v24?
Correct.MAXROYPHILLIP wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 1:01 amyou think cities have to be 24v24 and solo quers should face premades. ok tyKaelang wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 12:59 amCities are 24v24 content, that's how they was designed and that's how they're implemented.
You're providing a suggestion and I'm providing counter arguments.
It's like asking 'Does 40 have to be max level' or 'Does a scenario have to be 6'. Cities are intended for 24v24 and there's no update or foreseeable plan released to have that changed. That's not to say they can't or won't change, but you need to be able to answer arguments provided rather than just shutting them down.
- MAXROYPHILLIP
- Posts: 11
Re: Does city have to be 24v24?
Thank you for your feedback even though we disagree. I think those who do NOT enjoy 24v24 WB vs WB gameplay with graphics turned down should be provided and alternative for a smaller scale end game event. It shouldn't be locked to 24v24 and players that Q fast solo shouldn't be made to fill leaver slots- there should be an alternative for them a smaller scale fight strictly against other solo quers. It would be a 5-10min window. Then it goes back to as is. I think it would be hella simple to implement and add so much more variation to cities and different metas for different scaled fights.Kaelang wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 1:03 amCorrect.MAXROYPHILLIP wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 1:01 amyou think cities have to be 24v24 and solo quers should face premades. ok tyKaelang wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 12:59 am
Cities are 24v24 content, that's how they was designed and that's how they're implemented.
You're providing a suggestion and I'm providing counter arguments.
It's like asking 'Does 40 have to be max level' or 'Does a scenario have to be 6'. Cities are intended for 24v24 and there's no update or foreseeable plan released to have that changed. That's not to say they can't or won't change, but you need to be able to answer arguments provided rather than just shutting them down.
No ones playing end game events truly looking and observing and reacting to player abilties and effects- cities as it is for me are just laggy zerg fests.
- anarchypark
- Posts: 2075
Re: Does city have to be 24v24?
after full assault on forts.
you're the vanguard of that army.
champions of king, royal guards.
It's not smugglers infiltrating at midnight for gold.
if that small sabotage action are allowed reward should follow the scale and effort.
maybe north dock~south dock area for 12vs12. smuggling supplies.
3 lane moba style also interesting.
24 for each lane.
to open side path, capture BW college, like lever system.
sorry i got derailed.
you're the vanguard of that army.
champions of king, royal guards.
It's not smugglers infiltrating at midnight for gold.
if that small sabotage action are allowed reward should follow the scale and effort.
maybe north dock~south dock area for 12vs12. smuggling supplies.
3 lane moba style also interesting.
24 for each lane.
to open side path, capture BW college, like lever system.
sorry i got derailed.
SM8, SW8, AM8, WL7, KoBS5, BW5, WP8, WH7, IB7, Eng5, RP5, SL6
BG8, Sorc8, DoK8, WE7, Chs8, Mg8, Ze7, Mara8, BO6, SH7, Shm5, Chop4
SC summary - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=20415
( last update : 2020.06.09)
BG8, Sorc8, DoK8, WE7, Chs8, Mg8, Ze7, Mara8, BO6, SH7, Shm5, Chop4
SC summary - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=20415
( last update : 2020.06.09)
- MAXROYPHILLIP
- Posts: 11
Re: Does city have to be 24v24?
we talking city's here not forts man, i think everyones aware on how bad forts play out- them being tuned down is another topic entirelyanarchypark wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 3:31 am after full assault on forts.
you're the vanguard of that army.
champions of king, royal guards.
It's not smugglers infiltrating at midnight for gold.
if that small sabotage action are allowed reward should follow the scale and effort.
maybe north dock~south dock area for 12vs12. smuggling supplies.
3 lane moba style also interesting.
24 for each lane.
to open side path, capture BW college, like lever system.
sorry i got derailed.
Re: Does city have to be 24v24?
There is easy solution to your problem: don't let soloQ que at all.
Ads
- MAXROYPHILLIP
- Posts: 11
Re: Does city have to be 24v24?
Aggreed lol but it would make cities predictable. Tanks being told when to taunt, 10+ being told where to focus dps- people being told when to drop morales/abilities in a strict 24man layout over and over by the same leader. The people playing like this as good as it is- it's no more different than pve. This loses individual plays you wont ever see in the game because it's un meta to do so in a 24v24.
Scenarios where players could judge for themselves when to use abilities in smaller scale fights if they wish would create a different and maybe broader gaming experience overall. Healers being able to truly shine, unique and unusual skill builds may come from it too. Clutch plays.
I think am am crazy when i say this but I don;t think theres been many people say oh great job there that was a good or clutch play- in a city. It's a bit of a mess at 24v24 imo. For me anyway
The best city fight i have had was a 14v14. You could do 4 bag drops for that or even 2 and i'd be happier playing it.
+1 to the fort instance btw in your avatar
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 35 guests