Page 1 of 4

AM need 160 int tactic

Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 10:25 pm
by Jusva321
you got the 160 wilpower but if you want to be dps it is hard to get the intel why not give them a 160 int tactic ?

Re: AM need 160 int tactic

Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 10:31 pm
by engharat
I agree, but then every healer should get the corresponding stat tactic - wp and dok should get the 160 strength one.

Re: AM need 160 int tactic

Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 10:37 pm
by balvor877
AM in general needs an overhaul. It's awful to play... Yeah, you can drain some faces off when the target is solo and without healers, but that's pretty much it.

I dont get why a cloth wearing healer has weaker heals than a medium armored healer. WP really got all the goodies. They designed the AM weaker because it should have dps and heals but in reality you can pretty much do only one thing, either heal or dps, since the mechanic is so bad.

The RP trees are also... were they high when they designed this?

The order side is really missing unique stuff. They mirrored everything to destro and nothing back. There really is not much left.

Id love to see SMs with two swords / dual wield. That would be unique and fun and order has anyway less dual wield classes.

And where is that squig bouncing on order side where the whole screen is shacking? Give that to IB.

Re: AM need 160 int tactic

Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 10:54 pm
by Grock
Honestly game woul be better if nobody had these tactics. They are the most boring tactics in the entire game.

Re: AM need 160 int tactic

Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 11:00 pm
by NSKaneda
Image
Spoiler:
AM is a healer class, not dps. If you want +160Int roll BW, Sorc or Magus.

As for "cloth wearing healer has weaker heals than a medium armored healer" - if your lambent aura tics are less than 300 you're doing AM wrong (and with crits those tics can get up to 550 - on basic hot alone). Then again OP wanted +160Int so no wonder the healing is rubbish.

RP trees are fine provided you want more from the game than just spamming ST heal - puddle - group heal (hots are for those pro healers that know the fact that using skills with shiny animations gets you focused and killed).

Dual wield SMs.. Sure, in lore SMs are the dps and WLs are tanks. Don't we all remember the brilliance that was the guardian spec?

-
-
edit: I thought I'd share my lowbie AM, 0/0 high magic, no pots or buffs, not even full genesis.. Is it weaker than "medium armored healer"? Perhaps. Is it weak? Maybe for now but it'll get better with gear - I have my rr8+ shammie to compare to after all. I spec them both the same ;)

Image

Re: AM need 160 int tactic

Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 11:18 pm
by emiliorv
yes please...lets spoil all those dps healers a bit more... looks like we dont have enough

Re: AM need 160 int tactic

Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 11:48 pm
by Sulorie
Breaking news, you need no +160 int tactic to hit int cap.

Re: AM need 160 int tactic

Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2021 12:19 am
by Oglaf
No.

You're an off-spec healer. Just like a tank shouldn't get a 160 STR tactic, neither should healers get a 160 INT.

Re: AM need 160 int tactic

Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2021 12:35 am
by Telther
Or get gud? 970 without it, not even in BiS or +24s, not very hard. Finishing my build I’ll be around 1030-1050

Re: AM need 160 int tactic

Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2021 12:38 am
by M0rw47h
It's not like you can put your renown into +INT, when you got +10% crit tactic?