Recent Topics

Ads

Suggestion : Slayer Changes

We want to hear your thoughts and ideas.
Forum rules
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use

Structured class balance suggestions belong in the Balance Proposal subforum. Class-related discussion in this section are considered as ongoing debates and ARE NOT reviewed for balance changes.
Post Reply
Whyumadbro
Posts: 485

Re: Suggestion : Slayer Changes

Post#21 » Mon Feb 15, 2021 2:04 pm

just a little upgrade to the 2h specc would change the game to the better^^
Top
Ads
User avatar
zulnam
Posts: 760

Re: Suggestion : Slayer Changes

Post#22 » Mon Feb 15, 2021 2:14 pm

wargrimnir wrote: ↑Mon Feb 15, 2021 1:57 pm Rampage should have a 2H requirement. Big weapons do strikethrough already.
Hehehe... Good one.
Spoiler:
Image
SW, Kotbs, IB, Slayer, WP, WL, SM, Mara, SH, BG
Top
User avatar
Bowldancer
Posts: 293

Re: Suggestion : Slayer Changes

Post#23 » Mon Feb 15, 2021 2:15 pm

Whyumadbro wrote: ↑Mon Feb 15, 2021 2:02 pm who wants to make a 2hslayer cinematic ?
We could base it on the true live event of "The Berserker at Stamford Bridge" who hold off an entire army all by himself with a 2H Dane axe.
Grimmsch Grimnirsson (2H Giantslayer, 40/85)
Spoiler:
40+: 2H-CHOPPA, AM, RP, WP, SM, IB, KotBS, WL, WH, BW, ENG, SW
Alts in T4: SHA, SH, BO, BG, CHO, MAR, WE
Top
Whyumadbro
Posts: 485

Re: Suggestion : Slayer Changes

Post#24 » Mon Feb 15, 2021 2:20 pm

Bowldancer wrote: ↑Mon Feb 15, 2021 2:15 pm
Whyumadbro wrote: ↑Mon Feb 15, 2021 2:02 pm who wants to make a 2hslayer cinematic ?
We could base it on the true live event of "The Berserker at Stamford Bridge" who hold off an entire army all by himself with a 2H Dane axe.
yeah a 2h slayer holds to bridge against a gobo army, thatcinematic would secure us the buff :D
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Suggestions & Feedback”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests