Page 7 of 7
Re: Patch Notes 25/11/2017
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2017 8:16 pm
by Lektroluv
Natherul wrote:Just to clear something up (even though I dont have to)
The issue with Expert skirmisher has been on my table for MONTHS, I did not know how to fix it when I first looked at it and then it just got put into the list of things to look at later, that later being last week. This is nothing that came about because of some recent event that some might suggest. The tactic was just broken to an insane level which should have never been allowed tbh
And it is a good fix, you ended with the madness of players doing 300k damage in scenarios with only one button spamming ability.
100% support this fix, the tactic was not only broken, it was overperforming too respect to other ranged dps dealers in areas duty.
Re: Patch Notes 25/11/2017
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 2:03 am
by Stinkyweed
What is the point, or what is the reasonable build, for ES without it applying to LA or STYa? Seems like a completely useless tactic otherwise.
Re: Patch Notes 25/11/2017
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 2:32 am
by dansari
Stinkyweed wrote:What is the point, or what is the reasonable build, for ES without it applying to LA or STYa? Seems like a completely useless tactic otherwise.
I have to agree.. since LA and STY are self casts, ES works with them. Same with all self casts. The only purpose it would serve is if you somehow had a long cast time on a melee ability, which you never have.
Re: Patch Notes 25/11/2017
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 10:12 am
by Natherul
Stinkyweed wrote:What is the point, or what is the reasonable build, for ES without it applying to LA or STYa? Seems like a completely useless tactic otherwise.
It still applies to those abilities but it now actually recuires you to have a hostile target within the range specified.
Re: Patch Notes 25/11/2017
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 5:30 pm
by Stinkyweed
Natherul wrote:
It still applies to those abilities but it now actually recuires you to have a hostile target within the range specified.
Natherul,
Thank you for taking the time to explain that, I understand the change now.