peterthepan3 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 25, 2018 2:58 pm
oLdirtYtricK wrote: ↑Sat Aug 25, 2018 2:56 pm
Am I the only one upset with the actual literal content of the Patch/Changelog Note?
You may do them as you please but the changes or how to discover them in the notes just do not work for me. - as i do not own a WL toon and still would like to know what to expect of them.
All without a wl can't grasp the diffrences (tbh lot of wl players wont neither - copycat builds ftw) of what the changes actually mean and way more important, will lead to .
What nasty catlitter we have to expect next!? if there is a next "viable"(exploitable = exploiting player ignorance) build.
I know that writing these lists is a hassle - still you should at least try, if you want to be taken seriously.
No offense, your project your procedure! Good on you and good to know..
I dont want any equations or deeper mechanics. A vague written down impression is enough. The WL paragraph does not even achieve that ..
My 2cents
PS: And second hand information provided by "insert player" is even less sufficient.
I'm sorry, but how on
earth could one possibly have a gripe with how the patchnotes have been presented? They are thorough and very explanatory.
No need to be sorry.. I have no gripe.. I simply found it odd, cause if you compare the description of SM changes to the WLs (which the latter one is stated to be more of a game changer) you notice a diffrence.
The only information that I got from the WL part is what WILL NOT happen - or is unlikely.
It's not an "issue" but something that caught my eye and does not fit in the 99.9 percent
Cause I agree with you on the notes general quality!
Edit: If it was not for that quality level I'd given even less of a sh*t^^ to stay frank