Lerilla wrote: ↑
Sun Feb 16, 2020 8:44 pm
Lithenir wrote: ↑
Sun Feb 16, 2020 8:37 pm
Lerilla wrote: ↑
Sun Feb 16, 2020 8:18 pm
"If you are participating in a siege city with a rating of 1 you will recieve nothing per stage loss."
Why should I try to defend/ attack when it's clear that we loose and get nothing for even try to do something?
You are clearly missing the point in this. This obviously is to discourage people from throwing zones and fortresses to get to the city and encourage the fighting in the lakes.
I understand that, but there are also players who can't play 24 hours a day and can't wait for a 3+ star city to get the royal med. So, when a build WB fights against a non build WB, the not builed wb can leave instantly and the other gets free loot. And why should we stop rvr when there is only one fort missing. E.g. order needs only one fort missing for uv, oh but wait uv has only one star, let's stop attacking the fort and let's destro lock the fort back. Should this be the sense of rvr? I don't think so.
Let me ask you one thing in return. Should the sense of rvr be that you don't participate in it and just wait in the city until a city siege pops? I don't think so.
Devs sadly can't change player attitude. And TBH I think it will be pretty rare to have 1 star cities being sieged. There is a timer of 8 hours in which the city cannot be sieged after it has been sieged and it takes 12 hours for a city to be increased to 2 stars.
From what I have seen this weekend were incredibly strong defended zones and rvr after all which is great. No one threw zones, this is rvr how it should be.
In return I'll probably won't see a city siege in a long time but I don't care, for me endgame is the t4 campaign with the ultimate goal to siege the enemy city.