BackIn2021OldPlanB wrote: ↑Fri Mar 04, 2022 9:23 am
Your decision is a continuation of bad practice.
While closing topics on unbalanced population.
Do you mean the thread that had 208 posts? We pushed the survey to support that thread and it was locked after 21 pages of interaction because it was just pure feud at that point and the survey was already out.
Then a second, similar thread, was posted a few weeks after and everything would have been fine if its content was normal. But the excessive random usage of misleading numbers was just annoying and didn't serve anything besides personal agendas.
Nowadays you could rarely notice any locked threads. You could create a thread right now about 'population imbalance' and nobody would mind. But there's a clear unwanted disruptive way of discussing critical topics, and that way is generalizing and providing random fake numbers.