I dislike the change, because when you want to use Treacherous Assault in a healer or caster class and you are really near, the animation of this skill is really bad. In other hand, an armor debuff is so much better to kill an healer using full armor talisman or any class with medium or heavy armor.
The pounce isn't a bad idea, but the animation is the worse thing, without dismounting skill or snear, you can stay so far or more than before used Treacherous Assault.
Recent Topics
Ads
[WE] Feedback on new TA "pounce"
Moderators: Developer, Management, Web Developer
Forum rules
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
Your topic MUST start with your class name between hooks (IE : [Shaman] blablabla)
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
Your topic MUST start with your class name between hooks (IE : [Shaman] blablabla)
Ads
Re: [WE] Feedback on new TA "pounce"
It's a thumbs down for me as well. I feel they made it worse. Not only is it pointless, but it is counterproductive. You leap at your target and then get stuck on some invisible **** and then spend time falling. What a waste of time TBH.
Re: [WE] Feedback on new TA "pounce"
After hours and hours of use.. I removed treacherous assault of my bar.
So basically out of 3 openers just 2 are usefull now.
I hope devs revert it back to old Treacherous Assault without pounce.
So basically out of 3 openers just 2 are usefull now.
I hope devs revert it back to old Treacherous Assault without pounce.
Krima WE RR 85
Re: [WE] Feedback on new TA "pounce"
every time i used it by the time the jump animation finished target is still unmounted and too far away ... sad but its happening
Re: [WE] Feedback on new TA "pounce"
it is impossible to use heart seeker after pounce (ping 60-80)

upd: i delete that pounce on my action bar now. that looks like skill for memes.
Better take shadow step from shadow warrior. That pounce realy badXergon wrote: ↑Sat Jan 09, 2021 11:47 pmImho, IF you really want to add Pounce to WE then either:
- it should be something like a 10-15s debuff which allows u to pounce on target WHEN u choice to, not automatically enforced.
- animation should be not the same pounce but maybe more like ASW Shadowstep - direct leap
Current form is very bad for any kind usage than trolling urself![]()

upd: i delete that pounce on my action bar now. that looks like skill for memes.
Re: [WE] Feedback on new TA "pounce"
Basically all the witch elfs are waiting for the revert.soldude wrote: ↑Fri Jan 15, 2021 3:35 pmit is impossible to use heart seeker after pounce (ping 60-80)
Better take shadow step from shadow warrior. That pounce realy badXergon wrote: ↑Sat Jan 09, 2021 11:47 pmImho, IF you really want to add Pounce to WE then either:
- it should be something like a 10-15s debuff which allows u to pounce on target WHEN u choice to, not automatically enforced.
- animation should be not the same pounce but maybe more like ASW Shadowstep - direct leap
Current form is very bad for any kind usage than trolling urself![]()
upd: i delete that pounce on my action bar now. that looks like skill for memes.
I dont even think an animation like shadowstep would do the JOB...
Afterall im just happy with original Treacherous Assault
No pounce
No shadowstep
Krima WE RR 85
Re: [WE] Feedback on new TA "pounce"
after every "fake-pounce" - i shout like this "where is my targettttt I'm flying no no no...fck"...dont use dont use again... 

- ikillyouheal
- Posts: 2
- Contact:
Re: [WE] Feedback on new TA "pounce"
Why do we still have this ability? .
Please we don't ask for something just REVERT treacherous assault back to what it was without the pounce.
Remove it until you think of something else to give or not give us in any case just remove the pounce element at least for the time being!
Please we don't ask for something just REVERT treacherous assault back to what it was without the pounce.
Remove it until you think of something else to give or not give us in any case just remove the pounce element at least for the time being!
Ads
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests