Recent Topics

Ads

[SW] Working as intended...

Swordmaster, Shadow Warrior, White Lion, Archmage
Forum rules
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
Your topic MUST start with your class name between hooks (IE : [Shaman] blablabla)
Flavorburst
Posts: 350

Re: [SW] Working as intended...

Post#41 » Thu Jan 23, 2020 5:18 am

Aceboltz wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2020 4:56 am
noronn wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2020 9:42 pm
What’s ur point? Probably glass cannon witch elf inced with almost half HP, and dies during KD. Elaborate why u posted this here 😂
Just a rr80 WE with full vanq and sc weapons...


I liked how a WE used stun+burst combo only to remove 25% of his enemy HP then the SW gets up and proceeds to litterally DESTROY the WE with his own stun+burst wich kills in 3 hits. Good balance, much fun.
That's not broken balance, that's shitty play.

I liked how we watched the same clip, but you missed just about EVERYTHING important about it.

Kekkers let the SW get a full set of dots and attacks on him, let them run for their full duration, then engaged at 4k HP (instead of just resetting the fight to have the drop on the SW and full HP).

He then opens, hit's vanish during KD which wastes a global (couldn't tell you why), leaves his back arc (opening himself up to parrys and to not having AW go through armor) to heal debuff (?!), doesn't detaunt at the end of his KD (since the expectation is that the SW is going to immediately KD you and unload), and proceeds to get his **** pushed in.

Kekkers got dumpstered because he played that very poorly, and your inability to see these details means that you probably shouldn't make comments about balance.

That said: lol1v1balance
Last edited by Flavorburst on Thu Jan 23, 2020 7:05 am, edited 1 time in total.

Ads
Popcornus
Posts: 18

Re: [SW] Working as intended...

Post#42 » Thu Jan 23, 2020 6:32 am

Aceboltz wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2020 4:56 am Just a rr80 WE with full vanq and sc weapons...
People unironically use the most inflated statistic and access to plain sets as metric for 'skill' or means to judge balance?
You can attach that, 'RR80, access to vanq/invader/x' to half the playerbase (especially since the implementation of Forts, tied with the plethora of 2x events), see what results that yields.

Itemization, positional/situational awareness, group composition, comms, etc. >>>> arbitary RR/gear.

Gear/RR doesn't automatically or magically turn you into a better player - you would think that, with more time spent, people have more opportunity to better their play, but that's an utopian PoV.

Unless you are looking at an engagement of literal sub40 vs BiS, the utterance of RR80 and the name of a gearset without any mention of stat allocation/details about itemization does absolutely nothing for your case... not that, in this said very case, it'd matter either.
Last edited by Popcornus on Thu Jan 23, 2020 6:49 am, edited 2 times in total.

noronn
Posts: 40

Re: [SW] Working as intended...

Post#43 » Thu Jan 23, 2020 6:46 am

Aceboltz wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2020 4:56 am
noronn wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2020 9:42 pm
What’s ur point? Probably glass cannon witch elf inced with almost half HP, and dies during KD. Elaborate why u posted this here 😂
Just a rr80 WE with full vanq and sc weapons...


I liked how a WE used stun+burst combo only to remove 25% of his enemy HP then the SW gets up and proceeds to litterally DESTROY the WE with his own stun+burst wich kills in 3 hits. Good balance, much fun.
Since when is Healdebuff + elixir of shadows a „burst combo“?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests