Recent Topics

Ads

Wonder why Swordmasters rarely S@B?

Let's talk about... everything else
User avatar
Wdova
Posts: 682
Contact:

Re: Wonder why Swordmasters rarely S@B?

Post#41 » Fri Apr 21, 2017 6:39 am

I think it has something to do with the Eyes wierdenes, when You equip shield.... :-D Nobody wants to see theyr characters looks like Frankenstein Brother :-)
Pigbutcher - Choppa RR80+
Cyplenkov - Marauder RR80+
Vdova - Witch elf RR80+

Hajzl - Swordmaster RR80+
Roznetka - Engineer RR70+

Ads
User avatar
Marsares
Posts: 364

Re: Wonder why Swordmasters rarely S@B?

Post#42 » Fri Apr 21, 2017 7:53 am

Torquemadra wrote:
Aethilmar wrote:I think the real question that needs to be asked here is why don't we see more Swordmasters dual-wielding?

Image
SMs were supposed to be the DPS class, WL was to be the tank class but the insanity of a pet based tank class was just not meant to be sadly so were lost among with the melee orc shaman.
Well, according to lore WLs shouldn't be a pet based class anyways. WLs just kill a white lion as a rite of passage and then wear their skin, they don't hang out with them. Obviously, we all know that lore meant little when Mythic developed WAR. :-)
Karak-Norn /// Asildur - RR100 WL /// Marsares - RR95 AM /// Nirnaeth - RR64 SW

Daknallbomb
Game Artist
Posts: 1781

Re: Wonder why Swordmasters rarely S@B?

Post#43 » Fri Apr 21, 2017 9:31 am

Hmm some wls riding White lions asi know?. But never seen As a Pet thats true
Tinkabell 40/41 Magus Whaagit 40/41 SH Whaagot 40/54 BO Daknallfrosch 40/72shammy

User avatar
Osred
Posts: 412

Re: Wonder why Swordmasters rarely S@B?

Post#44 » Fri Apr 21, 2017 11:18 am

Oh man if WLs were the tank class I'd actually play it.
Osri - 40/79 - Runepriest
Osarion 40/82 - Swordmaster
Osgrim 40/74 - Ironbreaker

User avatar
Crassus
Posts: 40

Re: Wonder why Swordmasters rarely S@B?

Post#45 » Fri Apr 21, 2017 2:41 pm

roadkillrobin wrote:If I remember correctly WL didn't mean to be a pet class originally and was redesign due to someone felt that it would be unfair that Destro had 2 petclasses while Order just 1. Considering the issues that came with petclasses AI and the how badly the pets plays in large scale combat, this was probobly a really bad decision.
Absolutely agreed.
WITNESS ME!
Image

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: sanguine8082 and 158 guests