Absolutely right. Absolutely no logic in this solution. When two hundred people attack a castle in a normal area, large lags will be created, and it would be right here to impose restrictions on the number of participants. And in the forts, the space is huge, there can easily fight 200 to 200, or 300 to 300 people. It is not clear why it was necessary to introduce such restrictions. Because of this limit, the half of the server just drops out of the game for a long time, which violates the very spirit of this project. It is necessary to remove restrictions on the number of participants in the forts.Grobbok wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 7:46 am with the opening of the fortress, we got a new endgame, but not everyone can participate in it.
only lucky or faster ones can enter the fortress and they are just a few ppl from many more who were fighting to lock the zone
many players are going to fortress portal only to see sign: GO AWAY, NOTHING HERE FOR YOU
is this kind of sharing of players for those who have succeeded and the rest that has to go without playing, is this a new, wonderful reward system?
disappointment, frustration and anger are increasingly spreading between community
if we are waiting for the sieges of cities, that only a few will be able to play again?
many players asking me how to get a new set, when they can participate in fortress attack or defense, and what I should say to them? NEVER? it is only for special ones?
good game cares about all players, does not divide players, has a fair system for everyone!
Broken endgame
Re: Broken endgame
15th orks on a dead elf's chest
yo ho ho and a bottle of rum
yo ho ho and a bottle of rum
Ads
Re: Broken endgame
I agree. When it spending half a day to collect warbands, hold points, but in the end to say to you, “thank you, and now we will play here without you. And u have to wait until we are playing oureself " is not funny.Grock wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 7:47 pm The problem is not with not getting rewards, the problem is that Fort is supposed to be a culmination of all the effort put into locking two-three zones, but only a few people actually allowed to enjoy that culmination, everybody else is told "show's over, go home" and thats not very fun.
Ideally it shouldn't have any population restrictions. Should be either just open zone and lagfest, or multiple instanced zones. And maybe scale rewards with difficulty of the siege.
I agree that for players <50 renown rang, 60+ rewards are useless, and that is problem, but they can be given the rewards suggesting to their renown rang level then.
15th orks on a dead elf's chest
yo ho ho and a bottle of rum
yo ho ho and a bottle of rum
Re: Broken endgame
just increase required renown rank to join, 51+ is fine
40/40 in ruin/green getting gear for 60+ is just wrong
40/40 in ruin/green getting gear for 60+ is just wrong
Re: Broken endgame
Plus have to consider making every player fluency in the zone. Another thing how to do a balance between Def and atac( for exp when atac 5 wb and Def only 1, for order playing almost more ppl it is right)) , but if it isnormal in the stsndart location, why should it be another in fortes?!?!))
15th orks on a dead elf's chest
yo ho ho and a bottle of rum
yo ho ho and a bottle of rum
Re: Broken endgame
tionnotblack wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2019 11:23 am Ask your money back if you dont like it.Ungrateful players...
Because of evil scum like you Torquemadra had to drop his position offically and started to work from shadows.Great minds of this server is being harassed greatly.
Forts are amazing
PS:MONTAGUE IS THE BEST.L2P YA'ALL
Torque actually just left, sorry to spoil tinfoil party.
- anarchypark
- Posts: 2075
Re: Broken endgame
stop necro outdated thread.
go get reserved slot.
how? play better.
SM8, SW8, AM8, WL7, KoBS5, BW5, WP8, WH7, IB7, Eng5, RP5, SL6
BG8, Sorc8, DoK8, WE7, Chs8, Mg8, Ze7, Mara8, BO6, SH7, Shm5, Chop4
SC summary - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=20415
( last update : 2020.06.09)
BG8, Sorc8, DoK8, WE7, Chs8, Mg8, Ze7, Mara8, BO6, SH7, Shm5, Chop4
SC summary - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=20415
( last update : 2020.06.09)
Re: Broken endgame
It s not true, now it is organised awful in my opinion. Why I have to wait 1-2 hours as very many players of server who had locked this area before fort? No limits no discrimination no previliage rewards for chosen )) your arguments ? Just not Bathurst, it is looking silly.
15th orks on a dead elf's chest
yo ho ho and a bottle of rum
yo ho ho and a bottle of rum
-
- Posts: 631
Re: Broken endgame
Let people earn the right to a guaranteed spot based on activities in orvr leading up to fortress event.
Ads
Re: Broken endgame
Simple just have multiple instances and once you’re in one youre locked to it so no going in and out like live. Limit it to 4 wbs. I don’t remember what the limit was but it was laggy on live too.
Re: Broken endgame
Open forts to everyone, make more action around forts cuz right now a fort siege is only a blob vs blob inside a room. Ppl stays afk and waiting for theirs 4 invaders.
decimo marauder
larsulu zealot
norsemanherra wp
stormurfru dok
larsulu zealot
norsemanherra wp
stormurfru dok
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Shima, twigsthesage and 73 guests