Page 8 of 12

Re: Is this working as intended ?.

Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2019 5:18 am
by kok
Diggot wrote: Wed Apr 10, 2019 9:41 am 4 second kill.
Image
I count 7 sec. Also I count 5678 dmg on an enrage choppa...
A 5sec Boiling Blood BW cycle on an debuff enrage choppa do more than that.
Diggot wrote: Wed Apr 10, 2019 9:41 am 3 second kill.
Image
Again , it is 4699dmg with one offload skill so it more like 5sec.
Diggot wrote: Wed Apr 10, 2019 9:41 am 4 second kill.
Image
You die to TWO WL, the major hitter only hit you for 4661.
Diggot wrote: Wed Apr 10, 2019 9:41 am 4 second kill.
Image
An enrage choppa with no armor and toughness to speak of getting hit for 6667dmg in 6sec
Given that you have 7.7k hp ....

None of your evidence show that a WL can kill someone in 3-4 sec

Re: Is this working as intended ?.

Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2019 5:46 am
by aa91837
kok wrote: Thu Apr 11, 2019 5:18 am
Diggot wrote: Wed Apr 10, 2019 9:41 am
Image
You die to TWO WL, the major hitter only hit you for 4661.
2d "WL"- pet :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Is this working as intended ?.

Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:36 am
by Knowthyself
The general tendency I have observed within this forums is that when Destro players points to a problem about a class here (surprisingly it is about WL most of the time.. I mean just check all of the threads that had been opened for WLs) they are being constantly accused for whining and those accusers are interestingly people who play WL toons. It is like you guys check this forum everyday for a possible WL thread to defend your I win because I am awesome you lost because you suck buttons. I haven't been playing the game for maybe two months now but it is still fun to see one of these threads and observe how hypocrite some of you guys can get when there is a balance question raised for your easy-mode class.

However, the funniest hypocrisy here is the excuse that the balance discussion can't be made over 1vs1. Please then can you explain why have you changed the classes like SH - SW and nerfed them from a proper DPS class role to an assisting dps in the first place? Was is because they were Overperforming in WB or 6vs6 play ? thanks.

Re: Is this working as intended ?.

Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:40 am
by Hargrim
Knowthyself wrote: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:36 am The general tendency I have observed within this forums is that when Destro players points to a problem about a class here (surprisingly it is about WL most of the time.. I mean just check all of the threads that had been opened for WLs) they are being constantly accused for whining and those accusers are interestingly people who play WL toons. It is like you guys check this forum everyday for a possible WL thread to defend your I win because I am awesome you lost because you suck buttons. I haven't been playing the game for maybe two months now but it is still fun to see one of these threads and observe how hypocrite some of you guys can get when there is a balance question raised for your easy-mode class.

However, the funniest hypocrisy here is the excuse that the balance discussion can't be made over 1vs1. Please can you explain why have you changed the classes like SH - SW and nerfed them from a proper DPS class role to an assisting dps in the first place? Was is because they were Overperforming in WB or 6vs6 play ? thanks.

You play mostly destro right?

Re: Is this working as intended ?.

Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:46 am
by RANT
....whaaat? You know we can see your gear through Armory, right?

I didn't even bother looking after Akume. He's rr78 wearing Best of Slot gear. You are a very glass rr42 in Anni and green gear trash gear my dude. Is there somehow a mystery going on? You are ranged dps low risk with a big payout, if you get the pew pew kill. He's melee dps with a big risk, and little payout. Big fish eats little fish. :roll:

Re: Is this working as intended ?.

Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:51 am
by Scrilian
If not for the constant pressure from completely competent and unbiased destro players - these last couple of unneeded WL "reworks" wouldn't have really happened. In this light calling anyone a hypocrite is really rich.
Tbh, these won't stop until WL is a shoddy, gimmicky, nonthreatening and overall inferior copy of its former self. Order just can't have their cake, once in a while, and eat it, I guess :lol:

Re: Is this working as intended ?.

Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:52 am
by RANT
My suggestion to you is if you die to someone who's played 15897d on your 3d 19h old character, I wouldn't worry about it too much. :roll: :roll: :roll:

Re: Is this working as intended ?.

Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2019 9:05 am
by gandresch
Even in the periode when Azarael changed the WL to a Marauder lite and it was very bad and not playable. Even then people still made on forums a topic and whined and asked for a WL nerf.

That says everything. Those people will always whine.

Re: Is this working as intended ?.

Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2019 9:56 am
by Acidic
The whole basis of the thread is suggesting that WL was not intended to give order solo and small groups free kills.
As there was a change that addressed this and it got rolled back one can only say “yes working as intended “

Re: Is this working as intended ?.

Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2019 10:15 am
by vianiznice
Knowthyself wrote: Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:36 am The general tendency I have observed within this forums is that when Destro players points to a problem about a class here (surprisingly it is about WL most of the time.. I mean just check all of the threads that had been opened for WLs)
It's really only new players who complain about WLs.
And judging by that, it's a L2P issue.