Recent Topics

Ads

So Balancing is based on Cinematics

Let's talk about... everything else
User avatar
NSKaneda
Posts: 970

Re: So Balancing is based on Cinematics

Post#21 » Sat Nov 14, 2020 6:32 am

Let's not forget that Tchar'zanek has a working Firewyrm of Tzeentch m4 ;)
RoR: Burszui SH, Ropopuch SHM<|[]|>Ginnar IB, Vidarr HMR, Runatyr RP ++ REV guild ++
Live: Karak Izor -> Karak Norn - Yarpaen IB, Ginnarr SL, Volundr ENG +Ithilmar's Chosen+
* * * playing 19 classes - running out of char slots * * *

Ads
User avatar
catholicism198
Posts: 1092

Re: So Balancing is based on Cinematics

Post#22 » Sat Nov 14, 2020 7:20 am

Jokes aside, they meant to say that they drew inspiration from cinematic trailers, e.g. the squig herder changes, in the same way that they drew inspiration for the “shield” wp from the prima guide. Nothing was balanced with regards to the trailers.

arturziomas
Posts: 41

Re: So Balancing is based on Cinematics

Post#23 » Sat Nov 14, 2020 7:20 am

In that cinematic where slayer fights with black orc i don't see any block/parry bypass, rampage should totally be removed, just saying.
:P

User avatar
Orgruk
Posts: 251

Re: So Balancing is based on Cinematics

Post#24 » Sat Nov 14, 2020 7:33 am

oaliaen wrote: Sat Nov 14, 2020 12:46 am Ok...by the context, Old(Bigger) Orcs become stronger and more resistent... So for those guys whit 80+ RR should be nice a pássive bonus on wounds / str / resistences. Just for the lore.
Image
Image
My Choppa/Slayer proposals : Better Rage > GTDC replacement > Balance

nocturnalguest
Posts: 492

Re: So Balancing is based on Cinematics

Post#25 » Sat Nov 14, 2020 7:59 am

you are just watching wrong cinematics


Click here to watch on YouTube

vastou
Posts: 60

Re: So Balancing is based on Cinematics

Post#26 » Sat Nov 14, 2020 8:47 am

This is not the good approach.

This is a free passion project, and drama/bad words are gonna make them quit one day or another.

User avatar
Aethilmar
Posts: 636

Re: So Balancing is based on Cinematics

Post#27 » Sat Nov 14, 2020 8:48 am

Lizardmen faction and playable Teclis confirmed ...


Click here to watch on YouTube

User avatar
NSKaneda
Posts: 970

Re: So Balancing is based on Cinematics

Post#28 » Sat Nov 14, 2020 3:35 pm

arturziomas wrote: Sat Nov 14, 2020 7:20 am In that cinematic where slayer fights with black orc i don't see any block/parry bypass, rampage should totally be removed, just saying.
:P
That black ork uses disarm and disorient which totally works against rampage slayer ;)
RoR: Burszui SH, Ropopuch SHM<|[]|>Ginnar IB, Vidarr HMR, Runatyr RP ++ REV guild ++
Live: Karak Izor -> Karak Norn - Yarpaen IB, Ginnarr SL, Volundr ENG +Ithilmar's Chosen+
* * * playing 19 classes - running out of char slots * * *

Ads
User avatar
wargrimnir
Head Game Master
Posts: 8286
Contact:

Re: So Balancing is based on Cinematics

Post#29 » Sat Nov 14, 2020 4:39 pm

vastou wrote: Sat Nov 14, 2020 8:47 am This is not the good approach.

This is a free passion project, and drama/bad words are gonna make them quit one day or another.
Well, no. It may get people removed from the server. I'm not so fragile as to quit over people twisting my words. :)
Image
[email protected] for exploits and cheaters.
grimnir.me Some old WAR blog

Freerider
Posts: 16

Re: So Balancing is based on Cinematics

Post#30 » Sat Nov 14, 2020 6:39 pm

Well the cinematic is pretty much true:
-Order only has rdps and their only healer is trying to be a mdps
-Destro only has Mdps and their only rpds is a roleplayer who want to kiss elves instead of killing them
-Order tanks dont exist
-Chosen tanks are too busy asserting their dominance on a enemy healer to hold the line
-WH/WE are so useless that they dont even appear on the video.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 61 guests