sure the fact that a cross-section win rate of all player of a class taking the best and worst player into one number is more meaningful than the actual ranking clearly showing a peak into destro. But because its not fitting into your point of view and destro pride mind its automatically a "shitlist". good argumentationBozzax wrote: ↑Thu Jan 27, 2022 5:14 pmWinrate in large datasets are far superior to your shitlist since mmr is a magic number that polutes all meaningful conclusionsknick wrote: ↑Thu Jan 27, 2022 1:47 pm if we cherry picking and make fantasy interpretation for the ranking we can have any result we want.
top 10 dd´s - 0 order DD´s but 5 destro (100%)
top 30 are 15 dd´s - 9 destro (or 60%) 6 order
top 45 are 19 dd´s - 11 destro (or 57 %) 8 order
top 60 are 24 dd´s - 14 destro (or 58 %) 10 order
top 10 player - 8 destro (or 80%) 2 order
top 15 player - 11 destro (or 73%) 4 order
top 30 player - 20 destro (or 66%) 10 order
top 45 player - 28 destro (or 62%) 17 order
top 50 - 31 destro (or 62%) player 19 order
top 100 - 56 destro (or 56%) 44 order
>than 1000 points 128 player - 67 destro 61 order
>than 1300 points 83 player - 48 destro 35 order
>than 1500 points 44 player - 27 destro 17 order
>than 1700 points 25 player - 17 destro (68%) 8 order
>than 1800 points 15 player - 11 destro (73%) 4 order
and so on
If we would follow your argumentation best DD must be BW with 53% winrate please nerf!
The truth is somewhere between all this numbers but definitive not just winrates