@Devs Please add group quee!

[Jaycub]

Might as well post it here, there really needs to be some kind of quitter debuff in place right now for declining a pop, or some kind of negative action taken against people who decline.

Losing way too many SC's becuase they are 6-8 vs 12 becuase some premade didnt want to take the pop. And at low pop hours this is a death sentence to everyone that did take it. This is one of the downsides to not having a group que atm.

[Tiggo]

if devs put their hands on sc queue, they can make it right instead of adding quitter debuffs.

dont let a sc start when its unbalanced. dont ad new players when it startet untill it gets unbalanced. (player number wise).

that way no quitter/not joing debuff needs to be aplied. Players stay flexible and queues arent prolonged cause non joiners cant queue for a sc for x minutes.

on topic: people really need to step down with their entitlement to tell devs what to do when. they will do whatever they can in whatever time they need.

and op: really? there are BIG threads about group queueing, sc balance etc. pls. inform yourself before posting. you are stealing PRECIOUS dev time.

[mickeye]

Might as well post it here, there really needs to be some kind of quitter debuff in place right now for declining a pop, or some kind of negative action taken against people who decline.

Losing way too many SC's becuase they are 6-8 vs 12 becuase some premade didnt want to take the pop. And at low pop hours this is a death sentence to everyone that did take it. This is one of the downsides to not having a group que atm.

So maybe having a group queue would fix that?

I don't know why are people against group queue... Premades are queueing together anyways and it's not a rare sight to see double premade in scenario.

[Tiggo]

im all for group queue, but i think group queuers should be matched against other group queuers and not against pugs.

this thread is more about timing and priorities.

[Bozzax]

At least double premades could be avoided with grp queue. Or premades vs sub 20s and/or badly composed pug teams (like no healers).

[Azarael]

What are you doing? :^)

I WAS going to get back to ability implementations, but now it seems I'm going to have to write the damn group queue instead.

I was warned that if I started giving the impression that RoR was anything but an alpha and the players anything but testers, this would happen... I guess I'd better listen next time.

[Bozzax]

Eh never mind us forum warriors we just fill the boards with s..t

[Jaycub]

What are you doing? :^)

I WAS going to get back to ability implementations, but now it seems I'm going to have to write the damn group queue instead.

I was warned that if I started giving the impression that RoR was anything but an alpha and the players anything but testers, this would happen... I guess I'd better listen next time.

The majority of us are happy with whatever gets added in any order, but I can understand how you get the impression of "entitlement" from threads like these and certain requests/attitudes in game. I think most of us understand it's an alpha and wouldn't have a problem if there was a complete wipe tomorrow. Don't let the autists get to you man :^)

[Tiggo]

What are you doing? :^)

I WAS going to get back to ability implementations, but now it seems I'm going to have to write the damn group queue instead.

so are you finished yet?

[Azarael]

Haven't even started. I realized that listening to what players want all the time in addition to giving my free time to work on this would make me a total b****.