Mez wrote:
Was this sarcasm? After that 30 page blackguard thread you pull this comment off?
Granted, 2-handed blackguard being an unfavorable spec (omg every class has them) was your cause, but your arguments were the latter.
I don’t know about you but im tired of trying; of discussing, no theory crafting matters now, any suggestions made is irrelevant till T4 as that is when balance changes have been made so there feels like there is point right now.
This thread is like every festerbomb, rkd imbalance, and other realm imbalance/biased thread ever where it will eventually devolve into well this realm can do that and this realm can do this, the back and forth over and over and quite frankly I feel that theirs enough of that stuff on the fourms as of the late so hence my statement
For the record that 30 page thread turned into a stone wall back and forth between uchoo and war vs nanjii and co the latter of whom seemed to be hell bent that its ok/unecessary b/c undetauntable tactic + tool tip dmg on CD even though the proposed solution by penril and others that the KD require both a specialization point AND a tactic slot AS WELL AS potentially requiring parry seemed more than fair.
Euan wrote:
I don't understand why you keep saying this. Marauder is very viable with the knockdown spec'd.
Sav monstro is nowhere near as strong, sav brute and you lose access to mutated aggressor, Giouttine and more importantly 50% crit increase
All that for a 3s KD that is AoE where you could more often than not just end up giving out immunities; its simply not worth it.
To say Sav + Monstro is viable is to say 2H bg is viable all the while it is being compared to SnB BG sure its “viable” but there is a much much better alternative