Why no wiki access control instead of wiki staff only?

A place to help us on the wiki (corrections, pages to add...)

Moderators: Developer, Management, Web Developer

Forum rules
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
Posts: 5

Why no wiki access control instead of wiki staff only?

Post#1 » Tue Sep 12, 2017 12:12 pm

I understand that the prospect of someone grieving is even less desirable on a wiki. However more people editing would mean a more up to date wiki and more content. Pics of items for cosmetic purposes, pics and stats for pq/pq influence rewards, quests and other such bits that are unlikely to happen due to the sheer amount of them and a limited number of editors.
I have done a bit editing on wikipedia and admit that the free for all editing there probably isnt a good idea for the ror wiki. However I have also contributed a bit to a family of other wikis: Liquipedia. Those wikis are run by staff and volunteers of Team Liquid (websites/forums: sc:bw/sc2, dota2, hearthstone, lol. wikis: dota2, sc:go, sc2, overwatch, hearthstone, smashbrothers, hos, sc:bw, rocket league). Mostly edited by them too. From editing (w/o any rights) some of those wikis myself I can say that the access control they employ doesnt feel forbidding while still allowing good control.

So why dont you use a type of access control for editing as well?
Such as:
  • no edits or only minor edits unless your account is X days old.
  • edits have to be approved by wiki staff unless you have X number of approved edits.
  • long time editors get more and more permissions (until they are maybe added to the wiki staff?)

Posts: 1

Re: Why no wiki access control instead of wiki staff only?

Post#2 » Sat Apr 27, 2019 7:14 pm

I agree, the wiki as it is runs completely counter to what a wiki is supposed to be.

The information that is currently on it is impressive for having been written by only two people, but is still extremely threadbare compared to an average Gamepedia wiki. If editing was open to the general public there would've been a lot more content on it.

User avatar
Posts: 6509

Re: Why no wiki access control instead of wiki staff only?

Post#3 » Sat Apr 27, 2019 7:29 pm

Can you imagine the misinformation that would be spread if we allowed the average Joe to change **** where he deems fit?

Should it be accessible to more people? For sure - but I don't think it should be open to everyone; people should apply for access.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest