[WL] Still viable?
Forum rules
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
Your topic MUST start with your class name between hooks (IE : [Shaman] blablabla)
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
Your topic MUST start with your class name between hooks (IE : [Shaman] blablabla)
[WL] Still viable?
So I'm coming back after taking several months off and I heard there was some work done to the WL that nerfed it. I'm a really casual player, and I'm wondering if they're worth playing now if I'm playing solo or in PUGs.
Ads
Re: [WL] Still viable?
Still viable. Great for solo play and 6 mans. Not so great in WB RVR play.
Re: [WL] Still viable?
Welcome Back. We are looking to fill in our 3 WL -1 tank - 2 healer 6 man if you need a guild.
message Zaxxond in game.
message Zaxxond in game.
- catholicism198
- Posts: 1092
Re: [WL] Still viable?
They received a slight nerf but When adequately geared they can still defeat people in 3 seconds.
Re: [WL] Still viable?
The nerf was to the guardian spec. The bread and butter Hunt/Axe is still solid.
Tourist SW 40/50+<Zaxxed> Discotec 40/40+<IRONIC>
Former Pragg/Badlands Destro Iron Rock/Badlands Order player.
Former Pragg/Badlands Destro Iron Rock/Badlands Order player.
- drmordread
- Suspended
- Posts: 916
Re: [WL] Still viable?
Wouldn't really call it a nerf either. (Just my opinion). WL can still solo hunt and kill just about anything.
Play around with 6 man to figure out what mechanics/specs you like. For WB (and dungeons with Lords that can be aggro'd by pet) I recommend the No Pet option, which actually is a viable play mode now.
Play around with 6 man to figure out what mechanics/specs you like. For WB (and dungeons with Lords that can be aggro'd by pet) I recommend the No Pet option, which actually is a viable play mode now.
Morrdread Ladydread Kickyerbutt Tamorrah Whisperrss SutSut Amniell
Lolyou Tahw Fortuna Sarissa Yiorrrgos
(and eight more to keep you guessing)
Re: [WL] Still viable?
Pretty much this, still the most popular class in Order too. I rather get ganked by a WH than a wl :^)drmordread wrote: ↑Tue Jun 26, 2018 10:16 pm Wouldn't really call it a nerf either. (Just my opinion). WL can still solo hunt and kill just about anything.
Play around with 6 man to figure out what mechanics/specs you like. For WB (and dungeons with Lords that can be aggro'd by pet) I recommend the No Pet option, which actually is a viable play mode now.
Re: [WL] Still viable?
Thanks guys, that's good to hear. Coming back I wanted to either play my WL or my Engineer (both about mid level) but I know Order has a lack of melee classes compared to Destro so I figure I'll pick my WL up
Ads
- peterthepan3
- Posts: 6509
Re: [WL] Still viable?
It's the easiest melee class to play on Order if you want immediate results.
Re: [WL] Still viable?
WH still looks 10x cooler which is more important.
Fley - Zealot Domoarigobbo - Shaman
Squid - Squig Squit - B.O.
Black Toof Clan
Squid - Squig Squit - B.O.
Black Toof Clan
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests