Recent Topics

Ads

[WL] Still viable?

Swordmaster, Shadow Warrior, White Lion, Archmage
Forum rules
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
Your topic MUST start with your class name between hooks (IE : [Shaman] blablabla)
Aebel
Posts: 125

[WL] Still viable?

Post#1 » Tue Jun 26, 2018 8:51 pm

So I'm coming back after taking several months off and I heard there was some work done to the WL that nerfed it. I'm a really casual player, and I'm wondering if they're worth playing now if I'm playing solo or in PUGs.

Ads
User avatar
Zaxxond
Posts: 431

Re: [WL] Still viable?

Post#2 » Tue Jun 26, 2018 8:53 pm

Still viable. Great for solo play and 6 mans. Not so great in WB RVR play.
Image

User avatar
Luuca
Posts: 1204

Re: [WL] Still viable?

Post#3 » Tue Jun 26, 2018 9:04 pm

Welcome Back. We are looking to fill in our 3 WL -1 tank - 2 healer 6 man if you need a guild.

message Zaxxond in game.

User avatar
catholicism198
Posts: 1092

Re: [WL] Still viable?

Post#4 » Tue Jun 26, 2018 9:17 pm

Aebel wrote: Tue Jun 26, 2018 8:51 pm So I'm coming back after taking several months off and I heard there was some work done to the WL that nerfed it. I'm a really casual player, and I'm wondering if they're worth playing now if I'm playing solo or in PUGs.
They received a slight nerf but When adequately geared they can still defeat people in 3 seconds.

User avatar
Darks63
Posts: 651

Re: [WL] Still viable?

Post#5 » Tue Jun 26, 2018 10:05 pm

The nerf was to the guardian spec. The bread and butter Hunt/Axe is still solid.
Tourist SW 40/50+<Zaxxed> Discotec 40/40+<IRONIC>

Former Pragg/Badlands Destro Iron Rock/Badlands Order player.

User avatar
drmordread
Suspended
Posts: 916

Re: [WL] Still viable?

Post#6 » Tue Jun 26, 2018 10:16 pm

Wouldn't really call it a nerf either. (Just my opinion). WL can still solo hunt and kill just about anything.
Play around with 6 man to figure out what mechanics/specs you like. For WB (and dungeons with Lords that can be aggro'd by pet) I recommend the No Pet option, which actually is a viable play mode now.
Image
Morrdread Ladydread Kickyerbutt Tamorrah Whisperrss SutSut Amniell
Lolyou Tahw Fortuna Sarissa Yiorrrgos
(and eight more to keep you guessing)

User avatar
Renork
Posts: 1208

Re: [WL] Still viable?

Post#7 » Tue Jun 26, 2018 10:34 pm

drmordread wrote: Tue Jun 26, 2018 10:16 pm Wouldn't really call it a nerf either. (Just my opinion). WL can still solo hunt and kill just about anything.
Play around with 6 man to figure out what mechanics/specs you like. For WB (and dungeons with Lords that can be aggro'd by pet) I recommend the No Pet option, which actually is a viable play mode now.
Pretty much this, still the most popular class in Order too. I rather get ganked by a WH than a wl :^)

Aebel
Posts: 125

Re: [WL] Still viable?

Post#8 » Tue Jun 26, 2018 10:45 pm

Thanks guys, that's good to hear. Coming back I wanted to either play my WL or my Engineer (both about mid level) but I know Order has a lack of melee classes compared to Destro so I figure I'll pick my WL up

Ads
User avatar
peterthepan3
Posts: 6509

Re: [WL] Still viable?

Post#9 » Tue Jun 26, 2018 10:51 pm

It's the easiest melee class to play on Order if you want immediate results.
Image

User avatar
Fey
Posts: 777

Re: [WL] Still viable?

Post#10 » Tue Jun 26, 2018 11:17 pm

WH still looks 10x cooler which is more important.
Fley - Zealot Domoarigobbo - Shaman
Squid - Squig Squit - B.O.
Black Toof Clan

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Fakeyou and 10 guests