Page 2 of 3
Re: WL's Hack And Slash tactic suggestion
Posted: Tue May 20, 2025 10:48 am
by Battlefield
Reivren27 wrote: ↑Tue May 20, 2025 10:41 am
Battlefield wrote: ↑Mon May 19, 2025 11:49 pm
This is a subtle change as it will affect more armored targets and the Lion can penetrate light armor anyway
Yeah, dude, the wl is a beast that destroys unarmored targets, now let's make it destroy tanks in seconds too! ))
Marauder can penetrate tanks with direct damage abilities now, so why WL can't with at least 1 ability?
If you didn't know, the Piercing Bite tactic now stack with armor debuff and with weapon skills too.
Re: WL's Hack And Slash tactic suggestion
Posted: Tue May 20, 2025 10:56 am
by vanbuinen77
Its not needed
Re: WL's Hack And Slash tactic suggestion
Posted: Tue May 20, 2025 11:13 am
by Morpheus
And yet another completely absurd proposal from Battlefield to make an already far too strong class even stronger.
I also play white lion and it is insanely too powerful from T1-T4.
The author of this crazy suggestion should finally stop comparing the class mechanics with all his might and stop trying to change them.
No longer to be taken seriously.
Re: WL's Hack And Slash tactic suggestion
Posted: Tue May 20, 2025 11:15 am
by Battlefield
vanbuinen77 wrote: ↑Tue May 20, 2025 10:56 am
Its not needed
There is logic and regularity in this, why not? Maybe because you're playing a Magus in armor talismans and you don't like that your armor will be weaker after, less mitigation?
Re: WL's Hack And Slash tactic suggestion
Posted: Tue May 20, 2025 11:23 am
by Battlefield
Morpheus wrote: ↑Tue May 20, 2025 11:13 am
And yet another completely absurd proposal from Battlefield to make an already far too strong class even stronger.
I also play white lion and it is insanely too powerful from T1-T4.
The author of this crazy suggestion should finally stop comparing the class mechanics with all his might and stop trying to change them.
No longer to be taken seriously.
Everything is known in comparison and this is too minor a change to be so outraged ! I'll ignore you, you're writing nonsense.
But if you played for the White Lion long enough, then you should know that using an area of effect ability for 1 armored target is not quite normal, I'm talking about Slashing Blade.
Re: WL's Hack And Slash tactic suggestion
Posted: Tue May 20, 2025 11:48 am
by Mergrim
Easy fix add 25% to hack skill.
Remove 25% from whirling Axe.
Re: WL's Hack And Slash tactic suggestion
Posted: Tue May 20, 2025 1:53 pm
by nocturnalguest
Absolutely amazing proposals, like always! Keep it coming bro
Re: WL's Hack And Slash tactic suggestion
Posted: Tue May 20, 2025 2:09 pm
by vanbuinen77
Battlefield wrote: ↑Tue May 20, 2025 11:15 am
vanbuinen77 wrote: ↑Tue May 20, 2025 10:56 am
Its not needed
There is logic and regularity in this, why not? Maybe because you're playing a Magus in armor talismans and you don't like that your armor will be weaker after, less mitigation?
I have a wl, its not needed.
Learn to play.
Re: WL's Hack And Slash tactic suggestion
Posted: Tue May 20, 2025 3:39 pm
by Battlefield
vanbuinen77 wrote: ↑Tue May 20, 2025 2:09 pm
Battlefield wrote: ↑Tue May 20, 2025 11:15 am
vanbuinen77 wrote: ↑Tue May 20, 2025 10:56 am
Its not needed
There is logic and regularity in this, why not? Maybe because you're playing a Magus in armor talismans and you don't like that your armor will be weaker after, less mitigation?
I have a wl, its not needed.
Learn to play.
We are talking about armor penetration, why should WL use the Slashing Blade with the Hack and Slash tactic against a single armored target instead of the Hack direct damage ability, which is already included in this tactic initially?
Or maybe you dont use this tactic? Then it's fine you don't need it.
Re: WL's Hack And Slash tactic suggestion
Posted: Tue May 20, 2025 3:42 pm
by Battlefield
Mergrim wrote: ↑Tue May 20, 2025 11:48 am
Easy fix add 25% to hack skill.
Remove 25% from whirling Axe.
the next logical step is the same with Wrecking Ball