Page 2 of 19

Re: Sm/Bo talk only!!!!!

Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2015 12:32 pm
by Azarael
This is the last time I'll point this out to you.

A shield is WORSE than a HP buff.

A shield acts as temporary health without increasing the HP maximum.
A HP buff acts as temporarily health and increases the maximum HP as well.

Shields are applied after Toughness, so they don't benefit from Guard and armor/resistances like real health does, and they are ignored by morale attacks - another nice disadvantage.

Keep the faction partisanship out of here, especially when you are completely wrong.

Re: Sm/Bo talk only!!!!!

Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2015 12:44 pm
by Bignusty
Azarael wrote:This is the last time I'll point this out to you.

A shield is WORSE than a HP buff.

A shield acts as temporary health without increasing the HP maximum.
A HP buff acts as temporarily health and increases the maximum HP as well.

Also, shields are ignored by morale attacks - another nice disadvantage.

Keep the faction partisanship out of here, especially when you are completely wrong.
If i am a partizan of destruction you are same and between you and me there is a big difference i'm not a dev and when we are dev we need to be neutral and you are not neutral you give allways reason to order side and you play you SM.

Re: Sm/Bo talk only!!!!!

Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2015 12:48 pm
by Azarael
You might want to shelve what you think you know about me.

If you can point out a single instance in which I have directly lied in order to stop a buff that might benefit Destruction, then do so.

Otherwise, you're wasting your time trying to paint me as an Order partisan and in posting obviously false drivel, because it will be disregarded. There are plenty of people who understand the game who can come out here and set me wrong if my opinion is foolish or misguided. You are clearly not one of them.

Now, either demonstrate that my opinion on shields vs Wounds buff is wrong or go away.

Re: Sm/Bo talk only!!!!!

Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2015 12:54 pm
by Bignusty
Azarael wrote:You might want to shelve what you think you know about me.

If you can point out a single instance in which I have directly lied in order to stop a buff that might benefit Destruction, then do so.

Otherwise, you're wasting your time trying to paint me as an Order partisan and in posting obviously false drivel, because it will be disregarded. There are plenty of people who understand the game who can come out here and set me wrong if my opinion is foolish or misguided. You are clearly not one of them.
So stop ask me i'm a Destro partizan i just give my opinion about those 2 buffs. You can see the difference if you do this up and after if im wrong okay i can give you apologize.

Re: Sm/Bo talk only!!!!!

Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2015 12:56 pm
by Luth
Shields are the worst defense measurements, as they are applied and removed first. So besides thoughness, there is no damage reduction on shields...

Re: Sm/Bo talk only!!!!!

Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2015 12:57 pm
by Evildoor
I do believe that the only benefit of the shields is that you cannot lifetap if the target is shielded, but this small point is clearly outweighted by all their disadvantages.

Re: Sm/Bo talk only!!!!!

Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2015 1:00 pm
by Silvertusk
I think Bellows/Blade enchants are decent as they are the think BO/SMs need desperate are imo: make their kd at 9points def tree. And more important Make more Ardcore tactic give right in da jibbles an IB punt (its a freaking 11points tactic!) mirror this with SM and you have 2 viable tanks now with a good punt if speced for it and kd.

Re: Sm/Bo talk only!!!!!

Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2015 1:02 pm
by Vdova
Azarael wrote:This is the last time I'll point this out to you.

A shield is WORSE than a HP buff.

A shield acts as temporary health without increasing the HP maximum.
A HP buff acts as temporarily health and increases the maximum HP as well.

Shields are applied after Toughness, so they don't benefit from Guard and armor/resistances like real health does, and they are ignored by morale attacks - another nice disadvantage.

Keep the faction partisanship out of here, especially when you are completely wrong.
Pretty much agree with this.

Re: Sm/Bo talk only!!!!!

Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2015 1:17 pm
by Coryphaus
I'd just like to say I know where Joan is comming from as I was constant rejected in favor of chosen + Bg on live and if I was allowed to join they forced me to run no choppin me

This was what made me dislike playing blorc and just quit the class

And this sentiment is very much alive on RoR, when people started fighting in orvr during the lovers cloak event I was rejected multiple occasions on my bloc

I feel that at the very least you could move the kd for the 2 classes down to 9 pts and that would be a huge boon but I also feel adding the feature from 1.49 that made tuffer n nails into a grp armor buff would also be great

I feel that these changes will not be radical in any sense

Re: Sm/Bo talk only!!!!!

Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2015 1:23 pm
by Evildoor
Coryphaus wrote: but I also feel adding the feature from 1.49 that made tuffer n nails into a grp armor buff would also be great
Uh, then what's the point of We'z Bigger?