Return of Reckoning

darkh wrote:What's the best build for 31/40 slayer now?

http://waronlinebuilder.org/#career=sla ... 2:;0:0:0:0:

tomato wrote:The lack of flanking (taking third stat tactic instead, wth) in your builds speaks for itself.

Taking flanking is a personal choice, espically in late game when it competes for slots with

BF
Wild gambit
push for more
embrace the pain

No, flanking is a must have on Choppa/Slayer and almost any other mdps.
Unless your movement sucks.

Yvain if u see ppl with Dual Weapons dont think they are aoe dps. Its single target build. Nobody use DW for 10% parry and even ID but for better dmg from AA /Choppa dont have ID and also use DW/.
Wild Gambit its your best tactic and flanking. Ofc Push For More when u get 35 level.
Always try hit from side/behind (addon Nerfed Button help you a lot with Spine Crusher)
Rotaction: Onslaught>Slow Down if tank dont slow target>Deep Wound (ID, Shatter LImbs if ID spec)>Relentless Strike>Spine Crusher /refresh dots/.
I use Firecenes when full RAGE.
Use flurry only when target is out of range and u have enough AP.
Dont use rampage bc its use your RAGE.
And... Ask on chat for tank and heal . GL.

Sorry for my english.

A little bit of good advice in this thread.

Currently the build you should be aiming for is http://waronlinebuilder.org/#career=sla ... :;0:0:0:0:there is no good slayer spec for single target that doesn't include the heal debuff ID is great but not that great. You can play this in 2 hander but I like most prefer dual wield because its damage will rapidly over take a 2hander after just a few seconds on target.

T4 when your a big boy slayer and all the tools are yours to pick from your spec will look like this at a minimum http://waronlinebuilder.org/#career=sla ... 58:4059:0: The first important thing to remember to maximise your damage are to control your rage run red as long as its safe to do so but if another dps is looking at you funny consider dumping rage and running for the back lines (not always the best option but you will have to figure that out based on the situation). The second thing to remember is that ID must always tick its back load so get it in there onslaught>ID>deep wound>slow>ID>pulverize/spine crusher.

With the extordinary abundance of healers on order, i dont feel rune of absorption is that necessary

i also feel that embrace the pain is more or less too good to pass up

Coryphaus wrote:With the extordinary abundance of healers on order, i dont feel rune of absorption is that necessary

Look, i love to have the personification of destruction advice chat here doing its thing.

But you gotta stop putting in your random dellusions into balance arguments.

Your knowledge about how many healers order runs is anecdotical at best, when you start recommending people to not run some things because you seem to belive that everyone in order is a healer is when it starts to get out of hand.

Embrace the pain is ****.

Coryphaus wrote:With the extordinary abundance of healers on order, i dont feel rune of absorption is that necessary

i also feel that embrace the pain is more or less too good to pass up

I don't like that tactic, soft capping strength is already easy enough atm so the bonus it gives will only be a fraction of what the tactic states. Also if nobody is bashing on you it does literally nothing.

Flanking is the way forward or behind

Toldavf wrote:
I don't like that tactic, soft capping strength is already easy enough atm so the bonus it gives will only be a fraction of what the tactic states. Also if nobody is bashing on you it does literally nothing.

Flanking is the way forward or behind

eh i see your point

bloodi wrote: Look, i love to have the personification of destruction advice chat here doing its thing.

But you gotta stop putting in your random dellusions into balance arguments.

Your knowledge about how many healers order runs is anecdotical at best, when you start recommending people to not run some things because you seem to belive that everyone in order is a healer is when it starts to get out of hand.

I play both sides just like everyone in this game

Ive never had problems getting heals in Scs or anything because order does indeed have a lot of healers and rdps

Coryphaus wrote:I play both sides just like everyone in this game

Ive never had problems getting heals in Scs or anything because order does indeed have a lot of healers and rdps

No you do not, in fact i am sure all you do is post wrong **** on the forums.

There is plenty of scs at the 22-31 bracket where order does not in fact, have a single healer yet here we have you, the guy who is always saying untrue bullshit about what order can or cannot do claiming that you dont even need RoA because order has too many healers.

Seriously, stop it.