Page 13 of 20

Re: [POLL] What RvR system did you enjoy the most?

Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 10:02 am
by Razid1987
Rebuke wrote:4 is best
*Highfive*

Re: [POLL] What RvR system did you enjoy the most?

Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 2:21 pm
by Pixie126
I thought people liked their precious AAO? Why would they go for 3? No AAO in that system. Not introduced then. Like customizing your look? Not instituted then either. Both dropped in patch 1.3.6.

Re: [POLL] What RvR system did you enjoy the most?

Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 3:20 pm
by redmage3
Pixie126 wrote:I thought people liked their precious AAO? Why would they go for 3? No AAO in that system. Not introduced then. Like customizing your look? Not instituted then either. Both dropped in patch 1.3.6.
I think they're just trying to figure out which type of RvR system people prefer. I don't think it's a full "revert game to this point." So we should still have nice things :)

Re: [POLL] What RvR system did you enjoy the most?

Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 3:29 pm
by Telen
Never thought I'd say it. In retrospect I liked the resource carriers. I dont think waithammer would be much fun now as much as we maybe romanticize early memories when the game was fresh.

Re: [POLL] What RvR system did you enjoy the most?

Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 4:38 pm
by Vayra
redmage3 wrote:
Pixie126 wrote:I thought people liked their precious AAO? Why would they go for 3? No AAO in that system. Not introduced then. Like customizing your look? Not instituted then either. Both dropped in patch 1.3.6.
I think they're just trying to figure out which type of RvR system people prefer. I don't think it's a full "revert game to this point." So we should still have nice things :)
I wouldn't mind reverting balance changes done since then :P

Re: [POLL] What RvR system did you enjoy the most?

Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 8:38 pm
by FreddyNoNose
Bozzax wrote:Please use the existing discussion threads for posting new ideas or RvR systems that aren't represented in the poll
Other: I don't want the player base deciding it. Too many foolish things could result.

Re: [POLL] What RvR system did you enjoy the most?

Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 8:51 pm
by Penril
Telen wrote:Never thought I'd say it. In retrospect I liked the resource carriers. I dont think waithammer would be much fun now as much as we maybe romanticize early memories when the game was fresh.
I think waithammer (any pre-1.4 system) would be terrible for RoR. If people think x-realming is a problem now, it will be much worse if waithammer is implemented. People will take all BOs and keeps in all 3 pairings, and then log to the other realm and take those BOs/keeps back. Over and over and over. No one is gonna wait 45 minutes (or more) for a domination flip.

At least with 1.4 (and current RoR system) zones are locked/reset.

Re: [POLL] What RvR system did you enjoy the most?

Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 9:28 pm
by Razid1987
Penril wrote:I think waithammer (any pre-1.4 system) would be terrible for RoR. If people think x-realming is a problem now, it will be much worse if waithammer is implemented. People will take all BOs and keeps in all 3 pairings, and then log to the other realm and take those BOs/keeps back. Over and over and over. No one is gonna wait 45 minutes (or more) for a domination flip.

At least with 1.4 (and current RoR system) zones are locked/reset.
Good thing we have Devs who can adjust the system slightly then, completely avoiding that situation :)

Re: [POLL] What RvR system did you enjoy the most?

Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2016 6:32 am
by bichka
>WAR: Multiple zones victory points locks from doing PVE, SC and BOs/keeps
yeah, i remember how lock failed because of loosing SCs. Like PUG will care about lock.
also doing PVE PQ just for lock is worst idea ever.

you can hate 1.4, but lvling keep and carriers wasn't bad. also it make gankers useful in rvr, unlike standard tactics with bomb warbands with "proper" classes only.

Re: [POLL] What RvR system did you enjoy the most?

Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2016 8:20 am
by Bozzax
A small observation

AAO was added in 1.3.6 as a seperate feature and not as part of just one specific RvR system