Return of Reckoning

Truly doom flayer had some ugly sets

Torquemadra wrote:

Toldavf wrote:Truly doom flayer had some ugly sets

Yep and the textures arent even very good, how Mythic were able to slot a t4 set above sov and got away with it is beyond me, I guess people really needed something new.

I'm guesing people where to busying gawking/complaining about the stats and set bonuses to really spare a thought for their ugliness.

Think you could show WP female sets? Like Annihilator, If I remember correctly, they're very different to the male version.

RyanMakara wrote:

Theseus wrote:

RyanMakara wrote: Doomflayer look went with a very minimalist Witch Hunter appearance. Some love it, others despise it. I always thought it looked sort of cool, as it's different from the long-ass trench coats you see late-game.

Same as per live; 45.

I am clearly at the despising side, what could be couler as trenchcoat?^^

But as I can get the Dominator, I ma cool with it.^^

What's edgier than a trench coat on a trench coat-heavy class? A complete lack of trench coat.

Ok, its hard to agrue with that logic, I ll give you that. But it still looks kind of weird.^^

But as I said, it might be good as an alternate apearance for all who dont like trenchcoats.^^

I dont think that we will see lots of them around though.^^

Torquemadra wrote:

Theseus wrote:

RyanMakara wrote: What's edgier than a trench coat on a trench coat-heavy class? A complete lack of trench coat.

Ok, its hard to agrue with that logic, I ll give you that. But it still looks kind of weird.^^

But as I said, it might be good as an alternate apearance for all who dont like trenchcoats.^^

I dont think that we will see lots of them around though.^^

Its broken, its missing the buttflap part of the coat, the female version has it, will fix later on with client control.

Ah ok.... thanks for the info. That seems a pretty strange bug we got there.... but its quite funny as well.^^

Would be quite somethig get our hand in t7 set appereance, i hope is there somewhere in the client

It must be

Torquemadra wrote:

Theseus wrote:

RyanMakara wrote: What's edgier than a trench coat on a trench coat-heavy class? A complete lack of trench coat.

Ok, its hard to agrue with that logic, I ll give you that. But it still looks kind of weird.^^

But as I said, it might be good as an alternate apearance for all who dont like trenchcoats.^^

I dont think that we will see lots of them around though.^^

Its broken, its missing the buttflap part of the coat, the female version has it, will fix later on with client control.

So this will be the final appearance?

https://www.google.it/search?q=doomflay ... 7MaCr2FHZM:

This reminds me of how much I appreciate the armor appearance tab. Not that I'm blaming the devs, Mythic just had about 2 full sets for each class (on order at least) that I liked, and outside of that I have no idea what the **** they were doing.

Seriously, that WH hat looks like a dunce cap. Who looks at that and thinks "This is the garb of one of the most feared agents in the Empire."?

Telperien wrote:Conq..........Invader.....Warlord
Bloodlord....Sentinel....Dark Promise

Expansions: Tyrant and [Warpforged]

Like that?

Sentinel was equal to conqueror, dark promise was equal to invader. Bloodlord was on a level similar to annihilator.

Looking good.

Love this Black Orc armor on the left!!!...just sayin