Return of Reckoning

Seosaidh wrote: Sun Dec 16, 2018 2:26 pm Really? Hmm, I see. What would you suggest as an alternative for the WL and a MDPS? Slayer, SM?

Fiskrens wrote: Thu Dec 06, 2018 12:31 pm

I do however reject the idea that WL is the easiest Mdps to excel with in ORvR, WH/WE are much better for solo play in ORvR because they can almost always pick the fights they want and have better dps for fights longer than 4gcd's. They also have a better chance against medium tanky targets than WL does.

I don't know much about SW but as for WL it's a good class and very fun to play.

peterthepan3 wrote: Sun Dec 16, 2018 5:16 pm

Fiskrens wrote: Thu Dec 06, 2018 12:31 pm

I do however reject the idea that WL is the easiest Mdps to excel with in ORvR, WH/WE are much better for solo play in ORvR because they can almost always pick the fights they want and have better dps for fights longer than 4gcd's. They also have a better chance against medium tanky targets than WL does.

I don't know much about SW but as for WL it's a good class and very fun to play.

By 'easiest' I refer to the combination of medium armor, charge, a pet for pulls, ranged M1, highest frontloaded burst & having the best mobility. Mobility in RvR is king, imo, which is why I personally feel that the WL is an easier MDPS.

If we are talking about solo ganking then you could definitely make an argument for WH - but for overall use in a group as well, I would pick WL as it is a much more forgiving class (due to aforementioned reasons).