Return of Reckoning

Posted: **Fri Apr 21, 2017 6:39 am**

I think it has something to do with the Eyes wierdenes, when You equip shield....

Nobody wants to see theyr characters looks like Frankenstein Brother

Posted: **Fri Apr 21, 2017 7:53 am**

Torquemadra wrote:
Aethilmar wrote:I think the real question that needs to be asked here is why don't we see more Swordmasters dual-wielding?

SMs were supposed to be the DPS class, WL was to be the tank class but the insanity of a pet based tank class was just not meant to be sadly so were lost among with the melee orc shaman.

Well, according to lore WLs shouldn't be a pet based class anyways. WLs just kill a white lion as a rite of passage and then wear their skin, they don't hang out with them. Obviously, we all know that lore meant little when Mythic developed WAR.

Posted: **Fri Apr 21, 2017 9:31 am**

Hmm some wls riding White lions asi know?. But never seen As a Pet thats true

Posted: **Fri Apr 21, 2017 11:18 am**

Oh man if WLs were the tank class I'd actually play it.

Posted: **Fri Apr 21, 2017 2:41 pm**

roadkillrobin wrote:If I remember correctly WL didn't mean to be a pet class originally and was redesign due to someone felt that it would be unfair that Destro had 2 petclasses while Order just 1. Considering the issues that came with petclasses AI and the how badly the pets plays in large scale combat, this was probobly a really bad decision.

Absolutely agreed.

Return of Reckoning

Wonder why Swordmasters rarely S@B?

Re: Wonder why Swordmasters rarely S@B?

Re: Wonder why Swordmasters rarely S@B?

Re: Wonder why Swordmasters rarely S@B?

Re: Wonder why Swordmasters rarely S@B?

Re: Wonder why Swordmasters rarely S@B?