Re: kids at play
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2015 10:29 pm
Feel free to include examples of how the definition of "racism" has exceeded the bounds of discrimination based on race.
Warhammer Online
https://www.returnofreckoning.com/forum/
https://www.returnofreckoning.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2315
Ad hominem and Strawman. Cute.Telen wrote:If not liking tossers that defend racist slurs. Yeah.SeaTerror wrote: Did I strike a nerve?
I'm on a coffee break right now.Some of those real world problems are car/house payments, unfortunately. Some of us have to work even on superbowl sunday.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_privilegeAzarael wrote:Feel free to include examples of how the definition of "racism" has exceeded the bounds of discrimination based on race.
It about trying to have a community and not offending sections of it. Something you clearly wouldn't understand after you :| comment.SeaTerror wrote: Ad hominem and Strawman. Cute.
When did I defend racist slurs?
I merely pointed out that people shouldn't be so easily bothered by obvious trolls on the internet.
What stereotype?Telen wrote:Nice. :|, Superbowl Sunday and Racism.SeaTerror wrote: Unfortunately, modern criteria for what actually constitutes as "Racism" can mean virtually anything these days. It's like the definition of ":|" according to feminists.
It can mean whatever you want it to mean.
Anything else to add to your stereotype?
You have some of the worst reading comprehension I have seen in a while. All I said was that "It has an open definition"Telen wrote:It about trying to have a community and not offending sections of it. Something you clearly wouldn't understand after you :| comment.SeaTerror wrote: Ad hominem and Strawman. Cute.
When did I defend racist slurs?
I merely pointed out that people shouldn't be so easily bothered by obvious trolls on the internet.
That typical 'merican' male stereotype. Never had to deal with any prejudice so it totally confused by the concept.SeaTerror wrote: What stereotype?
Are you trying to make a point? Because your posts are just incoherent drivel at this point.
Its not an open definition at all. The same as what words people find offensive is not an open definition.SeaTerror wrote:
You have some of the worst reading comprehension I have seen in a while. All I said was that "It has an open definition"
You seem to be under the assumption that i'm pro-:| or something?
You'll have to explain that bizarre rationale to me.
Take a step back, take slow deep breaths. You are so upset that you can't even string together coherent sentences anymore.Telen wrote:so it totally confused by