Re: SH proposal
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2020 7:25 pm
I Love New squig armor. Its free, low cd, U can have any pet and when needed U can jump inside for armor buff.WarHawK wrote: ↑Sat Nov 28, 2020 1:52 pmwhich QA squig asked for such changes? I don't know anyone ... Everyone just wanted a minor buff.wargrimnir wrote: ↑Sat Nov 28, 2020 2:15 am
We asked for suggestions, people gave them, we used them to put together changes. These are the changes. If they're bad we will find out in the long run, over weeks and months, and we will make adjustments. Not on patch day with the sort of feedback that we were absolutely expecting regarding the reduced range of their skirmish spec or the reduced aoe capability to conform with our goals for the spec. Would it be nice to have 100' range on everything and retain spammable AOE? Sure it would. It sure would be nice. Does that make sense for the spec or a semblance of balance for the class where risk/reward needs to be considered? Nah. It doesn't. SH has a lot of survival tools if someone closes the gap on them. If they're going to run skirmish, it should come at some risk. It wouldn't make sense to load them up with any kind of mobile killing power that the class was missing while keeping all the distance that makes them incredibly safe to play.
Have you ever played a squig? I can hardly imagine.
First the senseless removal of the Renown Abilities, pet range nerf and now also the removal of the range tactic for a kite class.
AA tactic in the QA path, m3 makes more dmg than the skillable m4, removing the armor buff from the pet. that makes absolutely no sense.