Re: [Magus, Engineer] Buff like in never released patch 1.4.
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2015 3:54 pm
Then we have a DD, when dropping toughness tactic and slotting the intel one?Coryphaus wrote:armor buff + tough tactic = tank
lol k
Warhammer Online
https://www.returnofreckoning.com/forum/
https://www.returnofreckoning.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=6829
Then we have a DD, when dropping toughness tactic and slotting the intel one?Coryphaus wrote:armor buff + tough tactic = tank
lol k
I literally agree with everything you have said so far in this discussion. One has to wonder if this Zxul guy even played a magus in high lvls. Saying i did good with this class killing lowbies and unprepared people and therefore it's balanced is crazy. When you look at what magus/engi has compared to other rdps it's clear that they are not on par in anyway.foof wrote:Telling me I "didn't know what I was doing", instantly means you've lost the argument. You need to debate points, not try to use ad-hoc logical fallacies to discredit the person you are debating.
I sure as hell knew what I was doing, and I'm sure as hell I was, and still am, a better player than you. Your posts are pure anecdotal garbage that use no evidence to back themselves up.
So, because you wan't to debate in this brain-dead style, what was the name and RR of your Magus and server you played on since you were "so good". I knew almost every good Magus who played this game, and I'm positive you weren't one of them. But please, keep tooting your own horn while looking like a complete fool who couldn't find a point on a knife.
And trying to imply that the Magus/Engie wouldn't lose 90% of duels in a RR90+ environment instantly proves to me that you've never experienced that. When you duel the best players on your server, you would know that the class is horrible in 1v1. As you are trying to imply that "I didn't know what I was doing", I'm going to directly imply that 'YOU'VE NEVER DONE IT". Period.
And saying you can roam around and beat RR25 people is really important to this discussion. Really proves your point man.
You're argument in all honestly boils down to a very simple concept based completely on anecdotal evidence:
I DID GOOD ON MAH MAGUS HUURRR DUURRR CLASS IS GOOD HURR DURR I AM SPECIAL HAD SPECIAL SPEC SO GOOD HURR DURRR.
Please, just stop posting for everyones sake.
foof wrote:So lets go with the Magus here:
Here's a list of the Maguses utility/CC
A 3 second disarm with a 2 second cast time and a 30 second cooldown.
That also does more then x2 base dmg of sorc one- the disarm being a nice bonus- not to mention that it is 1 sec with CQ tactic which sorc won't take.
A very small knockback with a 1 second cast time, 10 second cooldown, 65 ft range.
Ask how many sorc would love to get that.
An AoE interrupt, 1 second cast time, 10 second cooldown, 65 ft range.
Agree, wasn't really useful.
A 3 second stagger (wow a joke), landmine. 15 second cooldown.
As a small clue, 3 sec matches a WH's KD. Pop one if you think WH is around. And if you didn't know that, no wonder you lost to 90%+.
A terrible melee range snare.
Which however does a very nice dps, especially after resist debuff.
A 3 second Kd based around pet, that requires you to kill your mechanic and have to resummon it.
A 3 sec KD is still very nice to finish off healers who lost some hp, and such.
And heres the Sorcs:
A ranged snare with a 2 second cast time, 10 second cooldown. - Better than Magus
Ask any sorc what it is actually good for- as is, if there was ever a single sorc who used it for snare, instead of part of the rotation.
A 3 second disarm, 1 second cast time, 30 second cooldown, and isn't specced like the Magus - Better than Magus
The magus disarm however actually does a good dmg, and with CQ tactic has same cast time- see above.
Willpower debuff.
Do you actually believe Word of Pain is used by sorcs for will debuff?
Aoe initiative debuff.
That no actual sorc ever uses.
A tactic that causes some spells to drain AP, debuff strength, ballistic, and intelligence.
That no actual sorc ever uses.
A tactic that causes the majority of your AoE skill to knockback.
That is only used to knock order off walls.
A group absorb shield tactic.
Which is only used if sorc is trying to solo a bit.
Considering that you admitted yourself that you lost 90%+ of the fights you were in, while I won the most I was in, you have a pretty interesting definition of a good player.foof wrote:Telling me I "didn't know what I was doing", instantly means you've lost the argument. You need to debate points, not try to use ad-hoc logical fallacies to discredit the person you are debating.
I sure as hell knew what I was doing, and I'm sure as hell I was, and still am, a better player than you. Your posts are pure anecdotal garbage that use no evidence to back themselves up.
Llell, RR 80 or so, played on Krag_Norn I think was it most of the time. As for a complete fool- see the post above, you don't even seem to know what magus utility is good for. Not to mention having no idea how other classes work- see sorc part.foof wrote:So, because you wan't to debate in this brain-dead style, what was the name and RR of your Magus and server you played on since you were "so good". I knew almost every good Magus who played this game, and I'm positive you weren't one of them. But please, keep tooting your own horn while looking like a complete fool who couldn't find a point on a knife.
Considering that as rr 70-80 I killed solo quite a few RR 100...foof wrote:And trying to imply that the Magus/Engie wouldn't lose 90% of duels in a RR90+ environment instantly proves to me that you've never experienced that. When you duel the best players on your server, you would know that the class is horrible in 1v1. As you are trying to imply that "I didn't know what I was doing", I'm going to directly imply that 'YOU'VE NEVER DONE IT". Period.
What it proves is that you didn't even managed to read what I posted, not to mention that I had beat order which quite a higher RR then 25.foof wrote:And saying you can roam around and beat RR25 people is really important to this discussion. Really proves your point man.
What this actually proves it that you have a problem with a reading comprehension. Not to mention that so far your posts can be summed up as "I sucked, so everybody else must had sucked too".foof wrote:You're argument in all honestly boils down to a very simple concept based completely on anecdotal evidence:
I DID GOOD ON MAH MAGUS HUURRR DUURRR CLASS IS GOOD HURR DURR I AM SPECIAL HAD SPECIAL SPEC SO GOOD HURR DURRR.
Please, just stop posting for everyones sake.
So far I had you and foof proving that you either don't know how to use the class tools, or don't even know how they work (that one about not knowing that magus armor buff stucked with armor pot, and was specifically changed this way from before- when it buffed for higher value, didn't stuck with pot, and would dissapear after 20 if I remember correctly hits, was a nice touch).Chsuan wrote: I literally agree with everything you have said so far in this discussion. One has to wonder if this Zxul guy even played a magus in high lvls. Saying i did good with this class killing lowbies and unprepared people and therefore it's balanced is crazy. When you look at what magus/engi has compared to other rdps it's clear that they are not on par in anyway.
I have played engineer class till rr 80 or so and I can compare it to my expirience from playing magus on RoR.foof wrote:There are plenty of ways to change it without giving Magus/Engie Sorc/BW level DPS. Obviously giving them Sorc/BW level DPS is a bad idea. What they always needed was more utility and/or CC.Zxul wrote:
There is no way to change it- if you add to magus the sorc dps, then why would anybody want to play a sorc? From other hand, give sorc magus's secondary tools- and why would anybody want to play magus?
For instance, the BW having a healing debuff and the Engie not is braindead class design. Yes, lets give the healing debuff to the high damage RDPS and not to the medium damage RDPS. /facepalm