Return of Reckoning

Yeah i turned in the quest before the fix, how do we get the cape when we only got the token when it only allowed us 1 choice?

is debloster for t3 gonna be 28 lvl gear rr and spec from now?

kweedko wrote:is debloster for t3 gonna be 28 lvl gear rr and spec from now?

Yes. The gear and level were always 28, the renown rank was dropped (from 30) so as not to cause conflict with the new renown point system.

".ror debolster" has been updated, and you can always use that command to see the debolstering requirements.

Genisaurus wrote:

kweedko wrote:is debloster for t3 gonna be 28 lvl gear rr and spec from now?

Yes. The gear and level were always 28, the renown rank was dropped (from 30) so as not to cause conflict with the new renown point system.

".ror debolster" has been updated, and you can always use that command to see the debolstering requirements.

so even less reasons go debolstering QQ

Hey, so my observations from the most recent RvR.
- please return to scenario players the means to complete rvr kill quest so they can slowly earn Anni pvp gear (anni)
- BO incentives
- earn faster influence gear - this needs to be much quicker
- cross realm penalty to RR and Inf gain and gain for Realm-Loyalty
- grant 5 potions reward for Keep complete quest.

As per the cross-realm problems I think that a big part of it is some parts of the game need to be functioning better which in turn helps play be as fun as possible during all times, not just the times your realm is doing well or zerging.

That said I really love how T4 keeps are working (both ways), I hope that can happen more in T2 and T3, and overall improve the ownership of all these keeps, even if one realm rules them all.
thx

navis wrote:- cross realm penalty to RR and Inf gain and gain for Realm-Loyalty

Would be nice if could be implemented ... +1

And no loot in PQ.

shaggy140 wrote:

navis wrote:- cross realm penalty to RR and Inf gain and gain for Realm-Loyalty

Would be nice if could be implemented ... +1

Did you consider that as this is a soft faction lock (because it requires us to be able to reliably identify all the accounts in use by a given person), it's unworkable for the same reason that hard faction locking is?