Page 2 of 4

Re: Portal in kv to Stonewatch

Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2019 8:31 pm
by CountTalabecland
Panodil wrote: Wed Jun 19, 2019 8:04 pm Or maybe just let people die who cant defend them self in the wild :D
Or maybe if people didn’t have to run to a random portal, there wouldn’t be anything for gankers to do and they might actually have to join the defense and be useful?

Re: Portal in kv to Stonewatch

Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2019 9:01 pm
by TenTonHammer
Manatikik wrote: Wed Jun 19, 2019 6:47 pm
At this point it’s ‘possible’ but an incredibly difficult and time consuming task to rearrange a whole map. Its probably not even on their list of goals at the moment.
devs could just put the portal for the winning faction in their war camp

Re: Portal in kv to Stonewatch

Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2019 9:05 pm
by Panodil
But ganking people who really want to afk in fort is so rewarding :D

Re: Portal in kv to Stonewatch

Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2019 9:08 pm
by CountTalabecland
Panodil wrote: Wed Jun 19, 2019 9:05 pm But ganking people who really want to afk in fort is so rewarding :D
Fair enough, how about if someone gets the afk tag in a fort they are teleported to where the portal is now? Then you and the group can 6v1 beat them with a prison sock filled with locks or whatever you want?

Re: Portal in kv to Stonewatch

Posted: Thu Jun 20, 2019 9:06 am
by Anjanolian
Panodil wrote: Wed Jun 19, 2019 8:04 pm Or maybe just let people die who cant defend them self in the wild :D
....When you wanna use portal and get message like that "in combat you cant"...if you are not in zergy or party/wb....totally f...
Its not about defending self or not....

Re: Portal in kv to Stonewatch

Posted: Thu Jun 20, 2019 11:46 am
by Panodil
CountTalabecland wrote: Wed Jun 19, 2019 9:08 pm
Panodil wrote: Wed Jun 19, 2019 9:05 pm But ganking people who really want to afk in fort is so rewarding :D
Fair enough, how about if someone gets the afk tag in a fort they are teleported to where the portal is now? Then you and the group can 6v1 beat them with a prison sock filled with locks or whatever you want?
We dont gank 6v1, we strong so we gank 24v1.

Re: Portal in kv to Stonewatch

Posted: Thu Jun 20, 2019 12:52 pm
by gargharoth
The only issue with that is engis pulling people through energy wall.
Order has the almost same portals, for example, at Black Crag.
I have a better idea, maybe you can put these portals in the enemy warcamp? :o

Re: Portal in kv to Stonewatch

Posted: Mon Jul 01, 2019 8:24 pm
by Jandeporas
Put fort attackers portal in cities.

"That's just the way it is" is the shittiest excuse you can scrap from the bottom of the barrel.

Re: Portal in kv to Stonewatch

Posted: Tue Jul 02, 2019 2:52 pm
by Marawo
Suggestions:
- After zonelock create/keep the spawnpoints in keeps, this reduces the reinforcement disparity (especially in zones like KV and BC).
- also remove the "out of combat" requirement to use these portals to counter longrangecheese thats only targeted to keep people in combat. It also wouldn't force players to selfsacrifice themselves out of fortspot because they fought the enemy off or threw a heal.

Re: Portal in kv to Stonewatch

Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2019 12:05 am
by Starke
Both sides suffer from camping and it's garbage.

The "attack and go to portal in zone, defend and portal in city" confuses new players. A lot. I know I lost my second fort spot because I thought I had to go to altdorf (my first was a defense). And I regularly answer the question of where to go. Making the portal locations somehow consistent would be... helpful. If that's in wc or city, whatever. As long as it's consistent.