Return of Reckoning

When comparing the two:



Fortress has no ws, and for that matter no toughness. With fortress sword being much harder to get, the stats on it (besides higher dps and 1% more crit) seems to be worse than subj one.

i like the stats on fort better, nice that they are not the same.

Hello,
I would rather see a choice between this offensive blade and crit reduction one that chosen and orc have. Also i hope some variant of high stats/0 crit /0 proc appear too at some point like blades from bb/BE. Imo sociopath sword suits warlord set nicely in terms of stats design just with needless proc.

Panodil wrote: ↑Sat Aug 08, 2020 7:48 am i like the stats on fort better, nice that they are not the same.

I like toughness, but guess will switch back item around for less init and more toughness.

The lack of WS is reason I never go for the 1-H's at all, complete crap for my Slayer who needs all WS he can get. The 2-H Fortress however quite the opposite, very solid Weapon.

Actual stats aside, the Fortress has 55 stats vs 66 stats from Subjugator, so that 1% crit being traded for 11 stats for such an upgrade sorta sucks IMO.

phononHYPE wrote: ↑Fri Sep 04, 2020 11:31 pm Actual stats aside, the Fortress has 55 stats vs 66 stats from Subjugator, so that 1% crit being traded for 11 stats for such an upgrade sorta sucks IMO.

65 (fort) Vs 66 (subj) => so its 1% crit traded for 1 stat (and also + 2.6 dps) . Better?

Having neither WS or melee power puts it in a weird place for MDPS. Compared to Bloodlord, Titan’s, or Subjugator these are awfully expensive.

I bought it just because I had nothing else to spend Invader on and I would rather have axes on Slayer (still pisses me off to have to use ugly hammers from the scen wpns) If I had the ability to convert Invader Medals to Sov At 5:1 or even like 10:1 I would never put off any sov/warlord to buy the fort weapons.