Return of Reckoning

Just did 2 forts as destro. In one case, we pushed one KV, order had over 100 in the keep. The second, order had 120 in keep and players were being rejected to enter for destro.

I thought the number requirements meant the AAO was kept from the previous zone. What seems to happen is that it is entirely possible to essentially throw a keep and then stack the fort with defenders, this scenario makes it almost impossible to actually win the fort as an attacker.

AFAIK the attacker pop decides the amount of defenders until it maxes out.

Every fort should have the same percentage of defender to attackers. I do not believe prior AAO has anything to do with it.

CountTalabecland wrote: Fri Jul 02, 2021 3:27 am AFAIK the attacker pop decides the amount of defenders until it maxes out.

Every fort should have the same percentage of defender to attackers. I do not believe prior AAO has anything to do with it.

It is possible to have a much higher percentage of attackers vs defenders aka 168 attackers and say 80 defenders.

Toshutkidup wrote: Fri Jul 02, 2021 4:08 pm

CountTalabecland wrote: Fri Jul 02, 2021 3:27 am AFAIK the attacker pop decides the amount of defenders until it maxes out.

Every fort should have the same percentage of defender to attackers. I do not believe prior AAO has anything to do with it.

It is possible to have a much higher percentage of attackers vs defenders aka 168 attackers and say 80 defenders.

Sure, empty forts are possible, wasn’t really my point but thanks for being hyper critical and pointing this out. I assumed full pop forts which are what balance should be around, my bad.