Recent Topics

Ads

Triumphant Jewelry - A request to reconsider the cost

Let's talk about... everything else
Dajciekrwi
Posts: 700

Re: Triumphant Jewelry - A request to reconsider the cost

Post#21 » Mon Nov 07, 2022 1:10 pm

Everdin wrote: Mon Nov 07, 2022 10:48 am Beloved ranked project failed and the costs (or the threat to remove it complety), are a childish reaction on the fact that there are not enough players that wanted the content.
Pretty nice say, im completly agreed!!

Ads
User avatar
BluIzLucky
Posts: 700

Re: Triumphant Jewelry - A request to reconsider the cost

Post#22 » Mon Nov 07, 2022 1:33 pm

wonshot wrote: Mon Nov 07, 2022 1:02 pm
Spoiler:
I dont remember there was this much complaint and wishes to get next tier level of gear removed, when Conq, Vanq, Invader and Royal sets were added.
Because thats tecnically what this is.

The ranked ring is allowing 9 setbonuses to be mixed, where as Sove were limmited to 8.
And the value of reaching one extra setbonus is very roughly the extra stats from going from one armor tier to the next, and takes about as many crests to get this extra setbonus as accumulating Sove.

MDPS getting that nasty WS proc is really really strong, but some of the healers getting acces to more resources from 4piece proc or mixing Vanq 2.0 castspeed proc with more stats is also really sweet. And without knowing im sure some of the 2hander solo roaming builds probably also find enjoyment of the extra setbonus you can mix in compared to previously.
So is it just blind anger towards the price, when the powercreep vs price is honestly pretty fair? :roll:
If it's so powerful it should be accessible and 10k crest for 1 item is not, having it behind ranked was not.
Sov ring is not even 2k and is on par with tri/vic ring for 80% of the price.. should we raise the sov ring price to 10k to be fair? :lol:

The only remotely redeeming factors of the 10k price point are..
a. a massive endgame crest sink for veterans (which shouldn't imo be tied to BIS item for a pvp game to this degree)
b. making ranked an attractive and intended primary alternative (it didn't, since insignias are still harder to get for 99% of players)
SM - Arhalien +80 | AM - Shaheena +80
ZL - Wildera +70 | BG - Blackcrow +70

User avatar
Omegus
Posts: 1385

Re: Triumphant Jewelry - A request to reconsider the cost

Post#23 » Mon Nov 07, 2022 2:35 pm

wonshot wrote: Mon Nov 07, 2022 1:02 pm I dont remember there was this much complaint and wishes to get next tier level of gear removed, when Conq, Vanq, Invader and Royal sets were added.
Because thats tecnically what this is.

The ranked ring is allowing 9 setbonuses to be mixed, where as Sove were limmited to 8.
And the value of reaching one extra setbonus is very roughly the extra stats from going from one armor tier to the next, and takes about as many crests to get this extra setbonus as accumulating Sove.

MDPS getting that nasty WS proc is really really strong, but some of the healers getting acces to more resources from 4piece proc or mixing Vanq 2.0 castspeed proc with more stats is also really sweet. And without knowing im sure some of the 2hander solo roaming builds probably also find enjoyment of the extra setbonus you can mix in compared to previously.

So is it just blind anger towards the price, when the powercreep vs price is honestly pretty fair? :roll:
Some classes were already mixing 9 set pieces if they could combo Sentinel with a slot-4 ring set. I can't remember if Sentinel was a life-tap build for WP/DoK, but for the other 4 healers I'm pretty sure it was a pure heal set and was comboed with Sovereign to get 9 set bonuses (6/3 is common for a Zealot, I've heard Shammys go 7/2?). Is the increase in power from 3pc Sentinel to 3pc Triumphant worth 9999 crests?

And again, look at the huge increase in power DPS classes can get from Bloodlord weapons which were made even easier to get.
Zomega: RR8x Zealot

User avatar
Wam
Posts: 803

Re: Triumphant Jewelry - A request to reconsider the cost

Post#24 » Mon Nov 07, 2022 2:53 pm

if you remove it you create drama
if you change price you create drama
if you leave it as it is you create drama for the instant gratification mi mi mi now now now

When it is what it is, one ring is not going to improve you that much even if its BIS

Its not that hard to farm if you focus only one character and really want it

As a player, having more choices is better, the fact its available without having to team with some toxic players is worth it alone.

Its long term goal for veterans something to work towards instead of acquire in one week.
Wamizzle Guild Leader [TUP]
Wamizzle Guild Leader [The Unlikely Plan]

User avatar
wonshot
Posts: 1105

Re: Triumphant Jewelry - A request to reconsider the cost

Post#25 » Mon Nov 07, 2022 3:16 pm

Omegus wrote: Mon Nov 07, 2022 2:35 pm ...Some classes were already mixing 9 set pieces if they could combo Sentinel with a slot-4 ring set...
Good catch, I stand corrected!
Bombling 92BW - Bombthebuilder 82Engi - Bombing 82SL - Bling 81Kobs - Orderling 80WP - Jackinabox 67WH
Gombling 85mSH- Chopling 83Chop - Notbombling 82Sorc - Powerhouse 81Zeal - Goldbag 80Mara - Smurfling 75Sham -Blobling 66BO

wanna993
Posts: 102

Re: Triumphant Jewelry - A request to reconsider the cost

Post#26 » Mon Nov 07, 2022 5:09 pm

Wam wrote: Mon Nov 07, 2022 2:53 pm
if you leave it as it is you create drama for the instant gratification mi mi mi now now now
Imagine thinking a 2k price (as a more reasonable price point) = instant gratification.

Sulorie
Posts: 7223

Re: Triumphant Jewelry - A request to reconsider the cost

Post#27 » Mon Nov 07, 2022 5:39 pm

wanna993 wrote: Mon Nov 07, 2022 5:09 pm
Wam wrote: Mon Nov 07, 2022 2:53 pm
if you leave it as it is you create drama for the instant gratification mi mi mi now now now
Imagine thinking a 2k price (as a more reasonable price point) = instant gratification.
For anyone not playing in pug warbands with unreliable DPS (lack of kill contri for loot), a 2k crest price tag on BIS gear is basically free stuff.
Dying is no option.

User avatar
normanis
Posts: 1306
Contact:

Re: Triumphant Jewelry - A request to reconsider the cost

Post#28 » Mon Nov 07, 2022 5:45 pm

adding triumphant emblem in city siege bags its good idea to keep city sieges more popular. atleast after x amount city sieges u can bue your triumphant ring.
triumphant ring is bis becaus its take slot 3 not slot4. i dont mind if increase sovereign and warlord cost of rings byt warlord should also take slot 3 (at moment its slot 4)
sorc can bue triumphant ring bye 1k medals seems very bad bug vs ather clases. how many such bugs are in ror?
"Iron Within, Iron Without!"

Ads
Sulorie
Posts: 7223

Re: Triumphant Jewelry - A request to reconsider the cost

Post#29 » Mon Nov 07, 2022 5:49 pm

normanis wrote: Mon Nov 07, 2022 5:45 pm adding triumphant emblem in city siege bags its good idea to keep city sieges more popular. atleast after x amount city sieges u can bue your triumphant ring.
triumphant ring is bis becaus its take slot 3 not slot4.
Warlord ring has no talisman slot, which seems to be the key factor for slot 3 items.
Dying is no option.

lemao
Posts: 300

Re: Triumphant Jewelry - A request to reconsider the cost

Post#30 » Mon Nov 07, 2022 6:21 pm

I wouldnt mind adding like 1 insignia for a city siege win, people would tryhard more and build more groups/warbands for it again.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], JackLope and 144 guests