Shield dok/WP gets to put out good assist damage that a book/chalice spec does not all while maintaining similar healing rates. Ranked was full of shield spec dok/WP for this reason.Mvl130 wrote: ↑Sun May 28, 2023 9:59 am Good thing we have heroes like you to maintain the balance in the game
Shamans have a free tactic that makes them run 30% faster for 5 seconds, 25% chance of proc on being hit, every 10 seconds, and they can cast healing/damaging spells without loosing that (and they are a ranged class that does not have to stop to cast its spells).
But a 12% chance to proc a 20% running speed for a melee healer equipped with a specific shield is "stupidly strong" ?
Can you tell me Detangler what are the drawbacks of playing chalice/book compared to shield ? You heal more, you die less, it works in any situation, you don't have to worry about being kited, your healing isnt negated by parry/block stacking and absorb effects on targets, tanks can save their guard for a melee damage dealer... The only reason to play shield is because you find it less boring than backline healing.
It's actually so easy to play book/chalice that pretty much any healing warrior-priest or DoK runs that spec, and that warbands or 6men tryharding kick you if you use a shield because they find it inconsistent, and it's inconsistent because of how easy it is to kite (among many other things I just listed). But making a shield functionnal would remove the "only" drawback from the spec according to the enlightened Detangler
So yes, there are still huge benefits of going shield over backing healing. It's already quite powerful in organized play. Low gear disorganized pug - not so much. Buff it more and it will easily outperform backline heals in every aspect for organized high level groups.
Guess you should think about all situations when you talk about balancing, huh?
P.S.Thanks for the attitude and sarcasm, by the way. It goes well with my morning coffee.