Return of Reckoning

nah i changed my mind already.

players can fix this on our own.

just treat all the other players the same way you want to be treated and it's fine, including the other realm.

stop trying to set up ways to "farm" the other side, that's fkin lame. play the fkin game, and be cool.

I think hard-capping the rvr pops is basically the best solution available, somewhere in the 40-60% aao range.

that would also *force* the population to spread between open zones (or not rvr).

I try to play the aao side, but it's a very frustrating exercise in futility.

And expecting entire ...

They need pop capped RvR lakes.

I don't think bringing back the campaign would help all that much.

There are shield builds that kinda-sorta work in RVR. (idk if it works in scenarios, not enough experience)

the problem is that rvr almost always ends in a siege, where shield wp/dok is just a pita to play at all. when I was testing it, i always kept my tome ready to switch to for siege, and then I ...

I feel bad for EU players because the game severely drops in enjoyability in rvr lakes once it goes past 100 v 100, imo.

1-4 wb vs the same is about the sweet spot for me.

I wish they would put in some pop-capped rvr lakes.

Sieges are just not very fun, and deffo not worth all the effort going into building and maintaining a guild warband roster.


I have thought & said the same thing since approx a month after starting playing.

it would be vastly better to swap the mechanics of territory capture in LOTD in place ...

yes, it promotes zerging.

for new players, that's a good thing. it shows them where to go to fight even if they don't meet autoband requirements.

personally, I would like to have an advanced version that shows the icon to the *enemy* team, like the zone event boss icons.