Search found 5 matches
- Sat Apr 05, 2025 7:14 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Rune of Battle is the new ID - who needs Slayers?
- Replies: 94
- Views: 9597
Re: Rune of Battle is the new ID - who needs Slayers?
Man, you just used rob on pets and saying such loud words? You just a bunch of cheaters, not respected dwarves anymore. Too afraid to relog main account or something? There is a special requirement check on that ability put into "1" for a pet and a "creature" even. So you can cast it on a ram for ...
- Sat Apr 05, 2025 7:12 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Rune of Battle is the new ID - who needs Slayers?
- Replies: 94
- Views: 9597
Re: Rune of Battle is the new ID - who needs Slayers?
Fin havent post a video. Sam did. Thats for first. So a miss here. Ive been there myself on runnie. Can assure you, not a single warband was harmed /wiped by 1 invisible character. Also i can assure you that there has been no 2nd stealth bomb and i can even assure you that WH wasnt there for at the ...
- Sat Apr 05, 2025 6:23 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Rune of Battle is the new ID - who needs Slayers?
- Replies: 94
- Views: 9597
Re: Rune of Battle is the new ID - who needs Slayers?
Pets not players is for sure.
- Sat Apr 05, 2025 12:45 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Rune of Battle is the new ID - who needs Slayers?
- Replies: 94
- Views: 9597
Re: Rune of Battle is the new ID - who needs Slayers?
Fin havent post a video. Sam did. Thats for first. So a miss here. Ive been there myself on runnie. Can assure you, not a single warband was harmed /wiped by 1 invisible character. Also i can assure you that there has been no 2nd stealth bomb and i can even assure you that WH wasnt there for at the ...
- Sat Apr 05, 2025 12:11 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Rune of Battle is the new ID - who needs Slayers?
- Replies: 94
- Views: 9597
Re: Rune of Battle is the new ID - who needs Slayers?
so now it is called explaining? ;) and bugtracker is for??? They are asking you to tell them what the bug *is*. They're saying that the way RoB was used matches the text of the ability and appears to be working as intended. So, what is the bug? Just because something isn't fun or is overpowered ...