Return of Reckoning

The problem is that this scenario was made for T1 and not T4 and it was chosen simply because of that roleplay event.

bg chosen tanks and dok zealot heals

dps up to preference

avoid bo and shaman

3 ironclad scs in a row without a healer against premades

You are a fool to think that time to kill would be shorter with 25% guard with 2h. With that change shield would become mandatory and because of the reduced damage pressure from tanks the ttk would increase even further.

i dont see any wrong with the IB punt, is better than CHO/KTB without tactic and they can give 10 sec slow with almost all abilities. I would recommend giving BO a tactic that enhances a ST punt depending on no plan, gud plan and better plan mechanic. SM could have something like that? sure but the...

NB does not exist anymore but the issue persist.

Life is made of choices. IB and BG have plenty, and that's great. Just don't put all your abilities in one sequencer. SM/BO have to make choices at each stance change... Some skills are not to be used at all : armor buff that does not stack with pots (most tanks, WP and DoK armor prayers...), other...

... and it makes absolutely no sense that some classes are better at it. There are many things where some classes outperform others. Some things are just not unified. One example is the AP useage. Some classes run out of AP very quickly while others pretty much never run out of it. I have never see...

I do not see a reason why punts should not be unified. Some tanks like IB/SM/BO are crippled because of their terrible short single target punt (IB) or lack thereof (SM/BO except that shield bollocks punt), while other classes with long punts (KOTBS/CHOSEN and BG) are overperfoming. Punting the enem...

how are we supposed to finish the objective when the zone is locked 90% of the time?