Mordd wrote: ↑Thu Sep 24, 2020 5:07 pm
Rapzel wrote: ↑Thu Sep 24, 2020 4:36 pm
Since you don't seem to understand even most bad destro know the end game gear is not handed out freely without any sort of effort.
The only stats of "You know the destro wining around 70% of all city instances." is from 2 months ago.
We don't know if they're legit (those also state 41% order winrate which leaves 59% for destro which is far from the 70% you state source:
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=39836).
These stats does not contain all the stages won, just the last one.
This was also during a period when Order was zerging to IC about 3 times a day (even before unlock), and the win rate seems to have evened out these past few weeks.
As long as we don't have the numbers of the amount of 24/18/12/6/solo queuers and stages won it doesn't really matter, nor do we have the data of distributed invader medallions/royal crests.
The interesting part is that the majority of people agree on the fact that Order have a select few careers that are seen as the best careers for cities (Slayers, KotBS, BW e.g.).
Yet people like you don't suggest nerfing these careers and buffing the careers that are not performing as well as these to balance out the faction, instead you suggest nerfing destro careers that can't even compete with their Order equivalent, because that would somehow magically make underperforming careers viable.
Recent actually sits about 65%. but hey your Destro you think thats great.
I didnt talk about any nerfs or buffs. make up more fake info for your losing argument. This thread was souly about the change to city bags and it hits one side worse than the other. You can make up all the fake arguments you like. the facts are the facts.
I don't need to make up fake info, because you do it for me.
You claim destro win rate is 70% with no source, I call you out and I provided a source that states 59%/41% (a snapshot of what it was like 2 months ago when "Order always lost city") to destro and tell you there's no value in only looking at stage 3 wins and losses, because there's 2 stages before that we don't know the win rate of. You lower winrate to 65% with no source.
What losing argument?
That you suffer from a severe case of cognitive bias?
That you try to ad hominem in every thread you show up in?
That looking at stage 3 win/loss ratio and base your opinion about city balance on that alone is a proper smooth brain move?