Spoiler:
Torquemadra wrote:Because its asinine, a buff is given, unexpectedly and instead of "cool lets see how it goes" now you want 3/4th of the total area surrounding a player to be undefendable? You really think thats a reasonable proposition given there is no "auto disrupt"? There is NO constructive comment without trying and taking stock and this hadnt happened in anyway shape or form and was nothing but random theorycraft.GodlessCrom wrote:I don't get the point of comments like this. Penril's feedback makes sense, and he isn't whining, he's offering a constructive comment. Why the backlash?Torquemadra wrote:
or it can all go back to how it was with a keystroke, dont look a gift horse in the mouth because it really didnt have to be buffed.
When I give out a probably unnecessary buff to see how it goes I dont expect to see "oh yeah and before I have even loaded in my marauder how about tripling its value and the only CHANCE of defending against it is to face head on".
"When I give out a probably unnecessary buff to see how it goes"
That horse is high and might isn't it