Regarding BG’s tactic “Terrifying Foe”, it increases toughness based on hate when using Hateful Strike.
I had also used the “Rugged” tactic too, which +160 toughness.
After testing, the “Rugged” had affected the result of “Terrifying Foe”, so I use both of them together.
My equipment’s toughness is around 350, after use “Rugged” is total around 500.
If “Terrifying Foe” at 100 Hate, it will be 700+
But I found that sometimes that my state is not refresh, although I am using “Rugged”, but my toughness still 350, need to re-equip the tactic, then the value will back to 500.
So this is a known bug or I mis-understanding something? Many thanks.
[BG] Question on Toughness Refreshment - “Terrifying Foe” and ”Rugged”
Forum rules
Before posting in this forum, please read the Terms of Use.
Optional: Start your topic title with your class in brackets (e.g., [Shaman]). It helps others find your post faster.
Before posting in this forum, please read the Terms of Use.
Optional: Start your topic title with your class in brackets (e.g., [Shaman]). It helps others find your post faster.
Ads
- anarchypark
- Posts: 2085
Re: [BG] Question on Toughness Refreshment - “Terrifying Foe” and ”Rugged”
did you test with .getstat ?
character sheet is not always correct.
character sheet is not always correct.
SM8, SW8, AM8, WL7, KoBS6, BW6, WP8, WH7, IB8, Eng5, RP5, SL6
BG8, Sorc8, DoK8, WE7, Chs8, Mg8, Ze7, Mara8, BO6, SH7, Shm6, Chop4
SC summary - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=20415
( last update : 2020.06.09)
BG8, Sorc8, DoK8, WE7, Chs8, Mg8, Ze7, Mara8, BO6, SH7, Shm6, Chop4
SC summary - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=20415
( last update : 2020.06.09)
Re: [BG] Question on Toughness Refreshment - “Terrifying Foe” and ”Rugged”
Many thanks and will try this tonight
Re: [BG] Question on Toughness Refreshment - “Terrifying Foe” and ”Rugged”
Character sheet is hardly ever correct

SM 82 / IB 82 / KOTBS 82 / WL 82 / WP 72 / SW 75
CH 77 / BG 6X / BO 6X / WE 6X / MAG 6X ...and others.
CH 77 / BG 6X / BO 6X / WE 6X / MAG 6X ...and others.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests