[WH] Burn Armor v Sudden Accusation v Fanatical Zeal

[shaggyboomboom]

I just wanted to start a discussion about these 3 abilities - they are all openers for the WH. I've been wondering which one is the most effective. Recently I've fallen in love with Burn Armor and the Seeker's Blade combo - pretty effective against melee based class, especially LOLdeeps tanks. But most people I see use Sudden Accusation. Why? Is it more effective? One reason I see is it being extremely universal, works on all target cause all it requires is the target moving.

[Dabbart]

Depends on the target imo. But SA was my go-to. Exceptionally few people stop moving after a WH pops on them, and FZ damage per cast tends to be worthless, and burn armor attack is only helpful on really quick AA classes. By and large, I always viewed those 3 as a free attack that gave x2 accusation and didn't eat a GcD.

[Panzerkasper]

The opener on the WH is quite irrelevant but SA is the best, because most targets simply want to get away from you after your opener+Kd burst. Its not like a WE with WB that profits way more from her Opener.

[Earthpac]

The opener on the WH is quite irrelevant but SA is the best, because most targets simply want to get away from you after your opener+Kd burst. Its not like a WE with WB that profits way more from her Opener.

How come a WE profits way more with WB? Does the damage proc it?

[Vandoles]

I'm sorry, does SA work now? Have I actually been playing for about a month thinking it doesn't work and all those shamans and squigs got away from me while I could have stopped it?

[Thelen]

I'm sorry, does SA work now? Have I actually been playing for about a month thinking it doesn't work and all those shamans and squigs got away from me while I could have stopped it?

SA works fine. The damage tics are pretty bleh, but if a target moves for the full duration its pretty sizable.