It can be traded but I think that requires rr50+ or 60+
Patch Notes 31/08/2019
Forum rules
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
Ads
Re: Patch Notes 31/08/2019
the right decision, especially the fact that the invader medal is given to everyone, the first it will motivate the lowbies, and secondly, they will be able to get good armor faster.
15th orks on a dead elf's chest
yo ho ho and a bottle of rum
yo ho ho and a bottle of rum
- phononHYPE
- Posts: 569
Re: Patch Notes 31/08/2019
Hopefully this will counter the "don't defend, I want my free-Fort token" mentality. Good job, hope it works (ie no abuse ... somehow).
Re: Patch Notes 31/08/2019
Decent ORvR change. Still waiting for balance notes.
Tootlez/Egron/Snotstickz/Kaiju
<Schweinejungs>
twitch.tv/tootlez1
<Schweinejungs>
twitch.tv/tootlez1
Re: Patch Notes 31/08/2019
Honestly, this kind of defense reward should exist in all tiers. Giving only defense rewards in the last pair of a T4 zone makes it the only zone worth defending?
What about defending a T2/T3/T4 mid zone keep. Those should ALL also give a defending reward of their type or greater(extra RR additional+medallions).
The game will still get steam rolled to the last pair of a T4 def to get that reward.
If T2-T4 mid zone defenses also gave a 'Invader' for defending. This would greatly limit the amount of one sided action that can happen. Granted, everyone would just be switching to defend for that reward also.
What about defending a T2/T3/T4 mid zone keep. Those should ALL also give a defending reward of their type or greater(extra RR additional+medallions).
The game will still get steam rolled to the last pair of a T4 def to get that reward.
If T2-T4 mid zone defenses also gave a 'Invader' for defending. This would greatly limit the amount of one sided action that can happen. Granted, everyone would just be switching to defend for that reward also.
Re: Patch Notes 31/08/2019
In T2/3 there is no attackink/defending. the zone is not tied to order/destruction in the same way as reikland/CW. To "defend" ostland means you have to lock it. To "attack" ostland means to lock it. There is no difference between attacking and defending in T2/3Raggaz wrote: ↑Sun Sep 01, 2019 3:32 am What about defending a T2/T3/T4 mid zone keep. Those should ALL also give a defending reward of their type or greater(extra RR additional+medallions).
The game will still get steam rolled to the last pair of a T4 def to get that reward.
If T2-T4 mid zone defenses also gave a 'Invader' for defending. This would greatly limit the amount of one sided action that can happen. Granted, everyone would just be switching to defend for that reward also.
Zputadenti
Re: Patch Notes 31/08/2019
anyone else anxiously checking the forums every saturday and breathing a huge sigh of relief when they put out patch notes where they havent broken any basic game mechanics
between those recent changes and the release of wow classic, things are just not going well.
between those recent changes and the release of wow classic, things are just not going well.
Ads
Re: Patch Notes 31/08/2019
We play ROR because we are not interested in WOW since 10 years. Most ppl here couldn't care less about Classic.rmpl wrote: ↑Sun Sep 01, 2019 11:10 am anyone else anxiously checking the forums every saturday and breathing a huge sigh of relief when they put out patch notes where they havent broken any basic game mechanics
between those recent changes and the release of wow classic, things are just not going well.
Dying is no option.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests